The theological aspect Part 2/4
This is part 2 in the "Theological aspect" posts, it will be based on the presentation of the "serpent seed doctrine" in its original theological version. Talking about seed commonly known as a reference to genes is interesting in the context of this Site/Blog, of course, there are detractors who try to debunk the said doctrine as a metaphor (of course it is, the whole Creation story is) and the seed are the word of God vs Satan or Evil word, ultimately making the distinction between Good and Evil which is typical theologians discourse, finalizing by a routine reminder of the necessity to obey God as our first Devine teaching, which is typical in preaching to sound as a saint and legitimatize whatever idea or concept you are trying to passe to the masses, detractors continue on as the overall doctrine has nothing to do with genes and procreation... typical political correctness advocates in theology.Based on the theological nature of Satan or Evil as incarnated in the partially evolved populations (more prone to corruption), the serpent seed doctrine will be metaphorically applied to the world's demographics and politics, of course, this is not deciding what kind of metaphor we will make out of holy scriptures but the logical outcome is that it must be [doctrine] beyond ancient populations, a mythical garden, and a mythical couple referring to the evolution of the human race to Homo S. Sapiens.
Notes:
- It will be no more or rare occasional mentions about the theological aspect in the international affairs parts.
- I use the word: God as the Supreme Being or the Great designer in this post because it is used often in holy texts and scriptures.
- PC advocates: Political correctness advocates.
Please Note: I'm not a theologian and don't have any academic or any sort of methodically acquired knowledge in the field, besides having a solid educational background which makes me qualified to do such tasks, I do an interpretation, a work of synthesis, and development of different, documents, articles, books, texts, occasional videos, all from the internet. (keywording rocks!)
Below are some examples of the substantial contradictions that exist between science and theology, the focus in the abstracts below is on the notion of time and how it is misinterpreted between science and theology, not in terms of "plus ou moins" hundreds or even thousands of years but in terms of millions and even billions of years.
But despite the Bible’s undeniable influence, mysteries continue to linger over its origins. Even after nearly 2,000 years of its existence, and centuries of investigation by biblical scholars, we still don’t know with certainty who wrote its various texts, when they were written or under what circumstances.
According to standard scientific theory, the sun, earth, other planets and asteroids (from which we get meteorites) formed at roughly the same time, about 4.6 billion years ago, accreting under the force of gravity from a nebula.
According to the standard big bang model of cosmology, time began together with the
universe in a singularity approximately 14 billion years ago.
Among the Masoretic creation estimates or calculations for the date of creation only Archbishop Ussher's specific chronology dating the creation to 4004 BC became the most accepted and popular, mainly because this specific date was attached to the King James Bible.
The construction of the pyramids is not specifically mentioned in the Bible. What we believe about their purpose does not impinge on any biblical doctrine. People are free to have different interpretations in regard to how these impressive structures were built and for what purposes, just as what occurs in the secular world when scientists have disagreements over their various models.
Concerning the age of the Earth, the Bible’s genealogical records combined with the Genesis 1 account of creation are used to estimate an age for the Earth and universe of about 6000 years, with a bit of
uncertainty on the completeness of the genealogical records, allowing for a few thousand years more.
Adam and Eve were not created until the 7th Day, approximately 9,700 years ago during the early Mesolithic. In addition, Adam was created, then placed in a botanical garden specifically “to dress it and to keep it”, and the Garden only (Genesis 2:15)
The "Serpent Seed" doctrine: from Theology to Anthropology
This post's take on the said doctrine will be a "contextual remise en cause", arguing that the overall metaphorical interpretations of ancient holy texts may be countless, are vague depending on how we interpret them and how we want to consider the metaphor, because it is agreed on to be A metaphor manny decipherings are presented which makes it an approximation and mostly depending on what origin, background faith, or motivation the scholar or the theologian have.
Contextual remise en cause
This "contextual remise en cause" is about, (all metaphors aside), what's the nature, demographic envergure, geographic areas, and historical eras of the populations that are targeted or used by the teachings of the holy scriptures. The nature of the populations in the sense that it is exclusively the 'super beings' created by God: Adam and Eve? in an absolute Creation scenario, or modern humans as Homo S, Sapiens, and Adam and Eve are just a metaphor of the evolution to modern humans, the demographic envergure, geographic areas, and historical eras are mostly distinguishing between a narrowed context of the Divine teaching targeting exclusively ancient populations and humanity in its absolute expansion in time and space: distant future populations all around the globe.Absolute Creation context
Taking the said doctrine in the absolute context of the Creation and the supposedly existence of Adam and Eve, in a garden, a snake, or Satan disguised as a snake seduced (beguiled as theologians like to say) Eve into eating a mythical forbidden fruit, which is interpreted as having sex (literally) with a serpent or Satan in any other form, Eve is impregnated and gave birth to Cain and the genesis of the cursed bloodline.
"And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." (Gen 3:13)
Later on below, we will see the two tendencies in interpreting the cited scenario, for now, we focus on this context: Adam and Eve (initially Eve, then Adam) sinned (disobeyed God), ate a mythical fruit from a forbidden mythical tree in a garden, God punished them and through their sin all of their descendants (modern humans) by making them mortals, women experiencing extreme pain during labor, realized that they are naked (acquired human conscience), and the most important aspect is that they distinguished between good and Evil which is crucial for the future of the human race; narrowing our context to the said couple, how can the supreme being teach a lesson to be exclusively related to them (Adam and Eve), the whole story of knowledge of Right and Wrong, obeying God, acquiring modern humans conscience is addressed to the humanity as a whole, Adam and Eve (without even considering them a metaphor of the evolution of Homo S. Sapiens) are used as a model of male and female probably earliest Homo S. Sapiens populations to give a lesson to humanity or whatever populations are present to warn and teach them and future populations about doing right, avoiding wrong, obeying God, and ignoring Satan, because he will ruin humans' lives, and bloodline, this makes the context of the story of the forbidden fruit exclusively concerning the existence of Adam and Eve in a garden and an actual snake or any other similar creature depicting Satan null.Global absolute context
The holy texts and scriptures in their essence, besides the tales and stories they tell fascinated early populations, are crucial in developing the human mind, teaching the moral codes indispensable to the existence of a healthy society, otherwise, they are our unique source of records of the early populations encounters of Devine or other nature, before Darwinism, the Creation theory was told over and over again, including a talking snake and a mythical forbidden fruit, that was routine and quasi unquestionable tales until the 19th centuries, holy texts are written in old times, with an ambiguous origin, they combine the Divine and the human, it is up to us to decipher what's reasonable and what's fantasy, nobody knows why the theory of the creation had to be like that and include a talking snake, but early population mentality was different, the wisdom is to see the Divine teaching probably altered by human interference and believe that it too immense to be limited to a small scenarios of a garden, a talking snake and a couple, other than it is a way or a metaphor (excluding Human maligne interference) to warn us about our short existence on Earth, and what to predict or expect as modern humans or Homo S. Sapiens.
Holy texts and scriptures (besides Humans interference which is more like tales and stories) have the task to address ancient populations as well as warn future populations and project it (serpent seed) on the miscegenation (seed or genes + cursed bloodline => miscegenation) going on today, it is just the logical approach because the Great Designer won't be addressing a couple (Adam and Eve) in a mythical garden or even very limited ancient populations exclusively, we are destined to multiply, that's the essence of life on Earth, life is always going on and expanding on Earth, and the danger of miscegenation, Archaic genes resurrection, and diversity are a lot more critical and lethal than the curse of Cain or whatever miscegenation was going in ancient times, there is no literal serpent seed, but there are archaic or inferior genes that Satan uses by corrupting partially evolved population to cross-breed with modern humans.
Our earthly time measuring is insignificant by cosmic or Devine standards, it is just the right thing to do to warn future populations about the danger of miscegenation and following in Satan's footsteps, while it may seem in terms of few or even hundreds of thousands of years, it is as a blink of an eye by cosmic time measuring standards, in God's or the Great Designer perspective.
The two inclinations in interpreting the cited scenarios
"The serpent seed doctrine" is mostly debated between two groups:A group: Religious fanatics who take it literally even implying Eve had sex with an actual serpent or a resembling creature, implying that it's Satan and that Cain's cursed bloodline has an actual serpent or reptile genes in it, sometimes they use a little bit more metaphor but without insisting on taking the story almost literally with a garden, a Creation, Satan with a physical concretization...
B group: Totally rejecting the literal meaning of the doctrine, while keeping the scenario of the Creation ( Adam, Eve, and Satan) even when some metaphor is considered, getting paranoid about talking about different or inferior genes, necessarily when Jews bloodline is brought into the spotlight, they are habile theologians, so they go metaphorically into debunking the doctrine, denying any possibility that seed is a reference to genes, despite that the word "seed" is universally known to mean genes.
Adam and Eve are the representation of modern humans or Homo S. Sapien, the serpent seed are the genes of an inferior level, definitely not a snake, not Satan genes, since the latter have no compatible physical representation or incarnation and holy scriptures and teachings won't be bringing up bestiality scenarios to set an example or teach a lesson to humanity.
Biblical Background
The "Serpent Seed" is mostly the Biblical reference about Eve being impregnated twice and Cain's bloodline is the serpent seed or the cursed bloodline, pretty much typical tales of holy books that most of the time use metaphors and overly simplified tales to inform people of that time about whatever they are wondering about in terms of origins of human beings, the difference between Right and Wrong, and mostly the greatness of the Great Designer beyond humans' perception.
While the said doctrine must not be taken literally or oven metaphorically in the context of the said scenario (creation of Adam and Eve), it is interesting that in its original theological interpretation it point out to genes and Evil bloodline, resulting of being tempted by Satan or a snake to have sex with, bear in mind that everybody knows that the snake is a metaphorical representation of Satan or Evil, which has no physical concretization as far as we know, talking in a metaphorical dimension, Adam and Eve are metaphorical representation of modern humans, to have actual sexual intercourse Satan must have a compatible concretization, we're not going full scale into bestiality or a Syfy scenarios to depict Satan as a mythical creature having sex with modern humans, but knowing Satan vowed to tempt humans, the logical demarches will be to sneak as other human kinds or Hominins that are easily corruptible (definitely not a snake) because they are not modern humans and therefore have no Devine spiritual connection, a void body, a vassal available to be used.Remise en cause of the metaphorical nature of the Creation theory
As cited above, Creation was used in ancient holy scriptures because it is "compatible with people's mentality in those ancient times".
If I'm wrong and this supposition [compatible with ancient people's mentality] is not valid, which means that the holy scriptures are not exclusively addressed to a certain era or certain populations that lived in ancient times, then it is probably addressing humanity-related issues in an absolute time span, it may be related to ancient times as well as predicting and warning us about future events, this will be the basis for a future times-related metaphor, applying the serpent seed doctrine on what we are living today of Globalization and miscegenation spreading archaic genes left and right, instead of a metaphor analyzing the serpent seed doctrine in the context of an actual garden, trees, a mythical fruit, and the consequence of Adam and Eve actions on them and their direct and even distant descendants in terms of the Cain bloodline, been expulsed from heaven, and similar occurrences believed to be caused by eating the forbidden fruit.Eve succumbed to the serpent's temptation. She ate from the tree, and made sure that Adam did as well. “And then,” says Genesis, “the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked” (Genesis 3:7). For this transgression, they were evicted from Paradise.
If I'm right and [the holy texts and scriptures are addressing and made specifically compatible with ancient populations' mentality], then it is a pure metaphor, there was no creation at all, no garden, no Adam, Eve, neither the serpent nor Satan, it is just the way to present the guided evolution and the origin of life on Earth in an extremely simple way to suit ancient population understanding, simple yet delicate, as seen in the previous part, there are details about the creation of the Universe cited in religious texts that can be related to the Big Bang theory as presented by scientists, by adjusting the earthly time measuring cited in religious texts to the cosmic related time span, (an earthly day as a metaphorical representation of a great phase of cosmic related time measuring). Because ancient religious texts are often vague and ambiguous about their real meanings, many interpretations are often made.
This is interesting the idea or the "doctrine of the serpent seed" as it is briefly presented below in its initial form.
The doctrine of the serpent seed, also known as the dual-seed or the two-seedline doctrine, is a controversial and fringe Christian religious belief which explains the biblical account of the fall of man by stating that the Serpent mated with Eve in the Garden of Eden, and the offspring of their union was Cain. This event resulted in the creation of two races of people: the wicked descendants of the Serpent who were destined for damnation, and the righteous descendants of Adam who were destined to have eternal life. The doctrine frames human history as a conflict between these two races in which the descendants of Adam will eventually triumph over the descendants of the Serpent.
Metaphorical projection on modern days: Miscegenation
As cited above, holy books and scriptures, besides presenting passing occurrences, they make predictions and warning about future events, it is extremely mesmerizing that the passage cited above is detailing how "modern days miscegenation is an abomination" in a few sentences. Talking about the Fall of man, caused by Eve mating with the serpent or Satan and the offspring is Cain, is nothing but an insinuation about modern humans mating with partially evolved people, it continues into the consequences of such crossbreed which caused the creation of two races of people, this is the concept of Race already presented in the holy texts: "modern humans genome stained by archaic genes or the serpent seed", it adds that "the descendants of Adam will triumph over the descendants of the serpent" or simply "people who's genome is stained by unholy genes" (Archaic introgression).
Amazing! Those words are from far beyond Earth, from somewhere in the Universe, wonder why they have a lot deeper meaning than a serpent, a mythical fruit, or a single woman being tempted by Evil. Well, we must address ancient populations in an extremely simple way so they take simple notes, perhaps, the future mentally developed populations can decipher the real meanings.
We use Satan's seed in a figurative sense to point out the fact that Satan will corrupt partially evolved populations into tempting modern humans to cross-breed or interracial mating, which creates a hybridization or a Frankenstein form of life, metaphorically speaking.
The Curse of Cain: Is the concept of Race already presented in holy scriptures?
From another angle or point of view, the curse of Cain is depicted as the existence of African or Jewish populations, depending on 'who you ask', which must not be taken literally, the Existence of Africans happened because of an evolutionary deficit (partially evolved), they never cross-bred with modern humans in ancient times, but they will be used by Evil for miscegenation at ulterior and recent times because the fight between Good and Evil was brewing since modern humans acquired conscience and made the Devine connection, it won't concretize until Evil passes from dormant Beast to revealing its nature when adequate conditions are assembled, the serpent seed is more of an insinuation to lower genes in the evolutionary path as the Archaic genes inherited in significant percentages by African and Semitic races, the temptation of Eve or the Woman [making the hypothesis that it happened previously in a mythical garden], is not of a great importance because of the isolation of the African populations until very recently and most importantly because of the clear separation we had between races until the post-Columbian era. Cain bloodline, is it inheriting Neanderthals' genes?
Please Note: When we say that Jews are Cain's bloodline, in this Blog/Site there is no such affirmation of the existence of the serpent or Satan's genes, but because it is an Anthropology and science-based Blog/Site, we present the hypothesis that Cain's bloodline may be caused by inheriting Neanderthals genes, when we say that Jews have inherited such genes, which define their nature, we talk about Jews from a racial and genetical difference, not in the frame of an anti-Semitic opinion such as having inherited "serpent seed" or other affirmations you may find elsewhere.Of course, when put in the global perspective and related to international affairs, we present the Zionist or Semitic Beast as Evil as it is.
Talking about Cain and the cursed bloodline, besides being wrongly interpreted as the African populations, it is commonly stated that it is the Jews Bloodline, which is plausible as an opinion, knowing that Adam and Eve represent modern humans, modern humans evolved out of Africa, while African populations stagnated in the continent, there was no globalization neither immigration at ancient times, even in a narrowed limited scale.The only two Hominins that existed in the modern world (Europe and the middle east) are Homo S. Sapiens and the Neanderthals, with a marginal existence of Denisovans in Asia and Australia. Homo S. Sapiens are modern humans (Adam and Eve), Neanderthals are Neanderthals or Semitic races when they get improved by modern humans' genes (Archaic introgression), anthropologically speaking that's how Semitic races came into existence (Native Americans, Asian (with a Denisovans' add up), Middle-Easterners, and all kinds that are not modern humans, neither Africans, because they inherited a significant percentage of extinct Hominins genes).
The serpent seed doctrine talks about Adam and Eve, the concerned seed would be cross-breeding with the Neanderthal beast at its initial state, depicted as Satan, Evil, or a snake because it has no Human conscience, partially evolved, not chosen by God to inherit Earth. Could the bible be talking about mixing with Neanderthal genes and the serpent seed are nothing other than the archaic genes of extinct hominins because they were in a brute-like state, such a beast beguiling Eve, which God warned and forbade us from mixing with because of its partially evolved, beast-like state, there was no African populations in ancient times' story unless the wrong interpretation of the curse of Cain as being Black, but if there was a warning about Neanderthals' genes, it is also valid, perhaps metaphorically included about African populations, because they are in a similar brute like state, and the whole story of the creation happened out of Africa. Could we be living another episode of the creation in those modern times, now available in Black? because we passed from Jew and Semitic races' bloodline around modern humans to a new phase, now Africa opened to the world and their bloodline is all around the planet. This leads us to the conclusion that the cursed bloodline mentioned in the holy scriptures is nothing but Semitic races and probably African races in the future.
What's crucial is the miscegenation and modern humans mating with primitive kinds that have happened and is ongoing recently at a demographics shifting scale, the serpent seed does not mean exclusively African genes, it is all genes of populations that are not modern humans because inherited a significant percentage of Archaic genes (serpent seed), That's the fall of man, it is not Devine anymore, stained Genes, the ultimate evolutionary stage is Devine, mixing with lower genes is a degradation of the Great Design.Modern humans were doing alright until post-WWII, now Human genome is stained and modern humans are subject to the worst degradation ever happened since Adam and Eve had to put fig leaves to cover themselves.
Beyond the Garden of Eden, we witness two kinds of people on Earth: Modern Humans and Diversified populations, they are diversified that's how Satan confuses us, we don't know who's human and Devine, who's the serpent seed bloodline and Evil, who's Right, who's wrong. PC advocates will tell you that we are all modern humans and the one human race propaganda... It is in the holy scriptures and from beyond the skies that it is written that the serpent seed exists, that we are not all the same race, Evil is certainly amongst us because miscegenation has been ongoing and the serpent seed are in humanity's gene pool. That's what diversity advocates wanted, dilute the serpent seed in the Human genome, so Evil pass for Saint and vis versa.
This is a Literal breakdown of the cited doctrine
It is composed of 2 words: Serpent and Seed, put in the context of a Garden, Adam, Eve, and Satan.
The seed is known to refer to genes, ancient books and modern interpretations both agree on the definition, the Serpent is a little controversial, it is known that ancient books and scriptures often use metaphorical expressions, figurative words, and mostly the stories and tales are probably insinuations or predictions and warning about future events.
If we put aside the theory of Creation and resonate in the context of an Intelligent Design (as defined in part 1) or guided Evolution, we can consider the term Serpent from three angles: A sneaky creature, A creature that is of a lower state in terms of Creation (lower evolutionary stage as the right process considered in this post and Site/Blog), Depicted as Satan or Devil passing for a snake (Sneaky nature: Evil ways).
The three angles will take us to the same conclusion: It is a warning about the seed of a rival of an inferior evolutionary level that will sneak into modern humans' gene pool disguised as innocent (sneaky ways), will tempt us (Satan), and cause us to disobey God. This is apparently a warning about crossbreed and miscegenation, primitive kinds sneaked into modern humans' ranges and tempted us to crossbreed or to fertilize the seed of the serpent (Archaic genes). Satan depicted as a snake is a reference to the old saying: The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist, snakes use the Serpentine method for moving, it is an extremely stealth method, you won't pay attention until it is in proximity and it strikes, that's how are Evil démarches around humans.
God said that he created modern humans (Adam) in his image, Devine, as the optimal evolutionary stage, never mentioned the Divinity of partially evolved people, prophecies happened exclusively amongst modern human populations, except Jewism. Those partially evolved populations lacking in Divinity won't be exactly beasts, monsters, or cursed as it is preached about Cain's descendants, but it will be modern humans' task to enlighten them, otherwise, they are easy prey for Satan to corrupt and use them, will happen frequently because it is Satan and Evil business to corrupt, tempt and use people against modern humans.
Ancient scriptures: if unaltered, are a Devine guidance to Humanity.
It is amazing that Humanity has been warned as earlier as that about the danger and destructive nature of miscegenation, just the fact of talking about the curse of Cain and African or Jewish people (without taking it literally) and linking it to the "serpent seed" is a clear warning on the fact that miscegenation happening and that is an abomination, some populations do not look different just because of a skin tone or hair texture (African populations) or they are just a different version of modern humans (Semitic races) but it's going all the way to our molecular genesis, either it's Homo S. Sapiens genes: the Great Design, or partially evolved people who inherited Archaic genes or the Serpent seed (metaphorically speaking). Those Archaic genes are like a Plague, God and ancient books warned us about Satan, without making a clear specification of what it is exactly, I guess it is hard to talk to ancients people about an entity that has no actual physical representation, the best way is depicting it as the sneakiest creature known to man: a Snake, talking about the Serpent seed is a way to present the actual concretization of this Demonic entity, talking about a Serpent besides insinuating sneaky ways is to insinuate a primitive form of life, since worms, serpents, and reptiles are the earliest simple forms of life that existed before evolving to more complex forms, talking about the Serpent seed is likely to insinuate mixing modern Human's genes with primitive forms of life genes, which are Africans, Semitic races, and other primitive kinds.
The doctrine of the Serpent seed, debunked?!
It seems that the doctrine of the serpent seed has a lot of detractors, what is fascinating about them or the overall interpretation of ancient holy books and scriptures is that people operating in that field just give their interpretations free will in deciding whatever they want that the holy texts meant (talking about the detractors), there are many verses in many different versions and translations treating the same subject, they just go on in their interpretations and Hebrew translations, like if Hebrew was God's language, whenever they are confused they just go to the Hebrew dictionary and find a definition that suits them.It is totally absurd that they just decide what they want the meaning to be, the metaphor or even the literal interpretation would be in whatever direction it serves their beliefs, whatever ideas they are preaching, or people they are defending.
They actually go on in a total absurd interpretation of the holy texts, because it is a metaphor there are many interpretations, but common sense must be not sacrificed and holy scriptures are far more important than actually talking literally about a tree and a fruit without being metaphors for more important teachings.
Ancient holy texts because they are ancient and of an ambiguous nature they present metaphors, but a certain logical reasoning must be respected, it is a metaphor because science and modern findings debunked the Creation concept as a whole, which means that the events cited never took place and it is indeed a metaphor which takes us to the real reason of talking about Satan, a forbidden fruit, serpent seed, and the tree of life along with obeying or disobeying God. There is no literal biological serpent seed, if the serpent means Satan or Evil, it has no physical beings concretization other than populations it corrupts, which are predominately partially evolved populations, which means "archaic genes, metaphorically speaking, are the serpent seed, Satan or Evil seed," because people who inherited significant percentage of the said genes are easy prey for Satan or Evil to corrupt and take control of them (soulless creatures didn't make the Devine connection, available vassals and void bodies), which makes them de facto some form of evil concretization and so are their genes, when they cross-breed with modern Humans it is the "doctrine of the serpent seed" not metaphorically speaking this time but it is well documented in the US census bureau, the EU or wherever diversity is going on, metaphorically speaking.
The wisdom of the holy scriptures is that we have been warned about Evil sneaking around, playing the victim in different disguises, (African and Semitic races), the silent invasion of primitive kinds continues without interruption, must say Evil is controlling humans' minds (ZOGs: Cain's descendants are controlling your governments), that's how miscegenation changed the genealogical core of humanity, you may call it the curse of Cain to sound like a theologian, but it is "Miscegenation as a modern days' projection of Archaic Introgression", modern humans are not on the top of the food chain anymore (metaphorically speaking of course).
Metaphorically debunking the doctrine: God's spirit or Satan's spirit, no seed.
This video posted below partially makes some sense, at least in the closing argument by focusing on the spiritual context between Good and Evil, presenting the metaphor about the forbidden fruit and the temptation as in the spiritual sphere not as an actual biological seed or genes of the Devil, it defines seed as "the word of God", and following God's teaching instead of the literal meaning of genes, to conclude that it is more about which word and instruction are followed, either the word of God, meaning God's seed or against the word of God, the Devil's seed, not literally, but the spiritual father is the serpent or Satan. It insists on the known passage describing Jews as the spawn of Satan, debunking it as well, it's ok, we can't contradict the Hebrew translations.
Applying metaphors "sur-mesure"?
It is a metaphor, those people agree on that, and that holy texts use metaphors and insinuations, this implies that even the theory of the Creation is a metaphor to explain to ancient people how modern humans come to exist on Earth because, as cited above, talking about evolution and even including intelligent design or guided evolution won't make much sense for minds of that era.Metaphorical texts can be taken in different contexts, those people are convinced that there was an actual Creation, a garden, and a snake, the holy texts actually describe that Creation, the only issue they have is to present the different scenarios that actually happened in the garden, as cited in this post, the theory of the creation is presented to suit people's mentality of that time, what if the metaphor is actually presenting future events and predictions, warning us about the great danger that is Satan or Evil, that will sneak around humans to tempt the women, of course, Evil is a concept, it needs a concretization, will use partially evolved people, they are partially evolved because they inherited significant percentage of Archaic genes which makes them different from modern humans, which are Devine because chosen by God, fully evolved and made the Devine spiritual connection, this makes partially evolved people's genes unholy, prone to be used by Evil: Serpent seed, because partially evolved populations are easily corrupted by Satan or Devil.
Diversity reaching its peak in recent days, serpent seeds are spread left and right, Satan is amongst us, Aren't the holy scriptures warning about a final battle between Good and Evil, the last time I checked it didn't happen in ancient times.
The morality of the story
It is this simple, there is a tree, a serpent, a fruit, Satan, and seed. talking about Satan seducing Eve into procreating from unholy seeds that are not modern humans (Adam) is pretty much an insinuation or prediction of the miscegenation and the diversity going on today, that's why there is a rise of the spirit of the beast, the antichrist. anti-Divine, or anti-Human. This explains the shift in Humanity's mentality and morals, it is the corruption brought by the spirit reigning in the world because the serpent seed (archaic genes) are spread left and rights, the rise of an animal-like form of life, the beast or the antichrist which is not a creature but a spirit or an entity that will take control of people's minds, because there was a shift in the world's demographic recently and Archaic genes are prevailing in modern humans' genome, as a consequence, it's not the Devine spirit that Uniting humans but the Beast spirit with all its rotten values and corrupted morals it spread in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment