Wednesday, March 15, 2017

A Bipolar World: With Marginal Fluctuations.Part 2

Evil prevails when good men fail to act
The recent events in Syria; the Russian intervention to fix America's mess in the region reflect a little bit my old cover pic and the expression: "Evil prevail, when good men fail to act", is finally explaining itself, since America was spreading terror and chaos in the region by the name of establishing freedom and democracy. Now, good men are taking over, so Evil will no longer prevail, at least as long as people figure out that "the greatest trick Devil ever pulled is convincing the world he didn't exist".
 Again, it's a bipolar world, if it's not America, a substantial intervention must be Russian, other countries and pseudo-regional powers are just particles revolving around the 2 poles of Good and Evil, or Humanity vs Zionism as in this post:


The increasingly globalized nature of Islamist extremism poses a medium-term threat through “plug-and-play social networks for future attack planning - linking diverse foreign fighters from different communities across the globe,” the experts warned. As of a global enlightenment of people across the globe about the actual situation of the planet under the rule, anarchy, and tyranny of the Zionist regime represented by America, Israel and its allies. While power shift can't be totally accomplished toward Russia to end up the monopole of America in manipulating and controlling the planet, due to their wicked diplomacy and skills in deceiving nations into their false propaganda and presenting facts about events as it suits their agenda. It being said in native Americans prophecies that humanity cutting edge and the enlightenment that will save humanity will most definitely submerge from Russia. Syria, Iraq turned into ‘international finishing school for extremists’ – UN report

Saturday, March 11, 2017

A Bipolar World: With Marginal Fluctuations.Part 1

From nations to Blocs: WWII context still prevailing
The international scene most importantly from the geographic perspective is more resilient to change than it was before WWI, political constraints and development of organs doing the world's cop makes it harder to achieve higher ambitions than it was at the time of great conquistadors as Napoleon or Christopher Columbus or Alexander.
Those organs such as the U.N enforce the geographic panorama forged post-WWII and act as the grantor of the sovereignty of nations. The impartiality of those organs is highly questionable, still a certain politic stability reign in the world. Often on the side, different approaches developed to serve agendas, not of nations but of poles, overthrowing leaders and governments instead of direct confrontation are the trends in modern history, along with arming militias to destabilize regimes we don't like, such as ISIS and different other cases. The major geographic map is rigid to any change, so we don't change borders, we change regimes, this is the case of the Zionist empire (the U.S) maneuvers in the world, mostly to protege a geographic mistake called "Israel".

 Desormais, those days we don't talk about conflicts between nations but between poles and blocs, is it an extension to the axis and allies pole? that's an interesting supposition.