Because of the importance of this Post "THE DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE", it will be divided into 2 Parts:
"GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE" and "PRACTICAL APPLICATION ON DEMOGRAPHICS".
An Annexe about: "Miscegenation as a modern days' projection of Archaic Introgression" will be posted right after this post, the base of this Annexe will be the page "Erectus Walks Amongst Us" which does not mean that there are actually prehistoric hominins wearing clothes walking around people, the overall idea is that there are prehistoric genes and Archaic introgression that has been transmitted to modern populations through extensive, prehistoric, multi-generational cross-breeding.

This is why the "GREAT DILUTION" going-on in today's demographics is some kind of a "Resurrection of Extinct Hominins".
The Spiritual Context of the Archaic introgression will be treated at 2 levels:


GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE
There is evidence of hybridization between modern humans and other species of the genus Homo. In 2010, the Neanderthal genome project showed that 1–4% of DNA from all people living today, apart from most Sub-Saharan Africans, is of Neanderthal heritage.
The overall idea of this post is that there are 3 main hominins who are genetically related to the modern days' population:

There are many evolutionary lineages and branches, most of them went extinct or produced a variety that does not concern our point of interest in the world's populations, Denisovans for instance, went extinct, left genetic traces in Australian Aborigines, and some Asian people, this hominin have no importance in this post, because it's genetic traces are present in populations that are isolated or do not affect modern day's world populations.
Homo s. Sapien DNA represents the predominant genes in modern humans, Neanderthal even though went extinct left considerable genetic traces in all of today's modern population except sub-Saharan Africans, the mention of Homo Erectus must be taken with caution because, while it sounds politically incorrect, it is more to point out to an advanced stage of the Homo Erectus and an Archaic phase of Homo Sapien, and more to the specific primitive nature of the African people, lacking any trace of Neanderthals and are not modern humans.

Anthropological roots of the recent demographic shift
Evolution is the ensemble of anatomical, mental, and behavioral changes that happened among the same group of hominins in a straight lineage and eventually will spread into branches, it is a complex process, it occurs on a long period of time, in a matter of millions of years in terms of lineages, branches take a relatively shorter period of time to form, anthropologically speaking.
While archaic introgression happened it is often on a larger span of time, of limited effects on altering the genetic traits of the receiving hominin because it often happens in narrowed very isolated cases due to the limited scale of interactions between the different hominins. It is totally insignificant compared to the recent genetics-related physiological changes we witness in populations or racial groups derived by cross-breeding with other kinds, this cross-breeding is an interference of "unnatural factors" that alter the natural path leading to "evolution". "Evolution" happens because of environmental constraints forcing a natural selection that causes survival of the fittest and adaptation of the survivors to hostile milieus, it goes in a straight intelligently designed path to 'create' the fully evolved beings called modern humans, the intervention of "unnatural factors" such as Horizontal or Vertical genes transfer from other racial groups, the incarnation of other hominins in an advanced stage such as Semitic races or Africans. "Vertical genes transfer" is simply interracial crossbreed, "Horizontal genes transfer" is used in a metaphorical sense, because while it is known to happen between simple organisms, proved to be happening within humans to a certain limited extinct, it is mentioned in a figurative sense to describe the craziness and mania that the abomination of interracial sex reached, mostly biologic fluids exchanges between different races that is not forcibly leading to the fertilization of the ovule and as a consequence the traditional vertical genes transfer.

Zionism will make this demographic invasion the bedrock and the basis for its Take Over of western societies, the evil scheme that started a long time ago, will ultimately cause Zionist agents to occupy key positions in Europe and American political organs, allowing them to pass laws and policies which will cause foreigners to have more rights than the locals.
The Discovery of the Americas was a decisive Event:
Ignoring Asians and Australians, Africans evolved in Africa, Europeans in Europe, and native Americans in the Americas. Those groups were mostly isolated from each other, except for the occasional, rare encounters and cross-breeding or interactions (ignoring Arabic's slaves' trade, because it is unimportant to the global perspective compared to the transatlantic slaves' trade, despite the fact that mixing with slaves was one of the causes of the collapse of the Ottoman empire, the west is following on the same steps).
The Evil side (as presented in part 1, 'archaic' human beings are prone to Evil corruption because of their partially evolved state) unleashed into direct contact with modern humans, either its slaves in plantations or native Americans, it's the ultimate judgment and the greatest test humanity will ever know.
Will modern Humans prevail, submit and keep this lower form of life under control, lead it from darkness to the right divine path or will the lower form of life thrive, using humanity resources and all the progress we made, use it against us, take over and prevail leading us into Darkness?

From the other side of the world, a massive "Semitic races" immigration to America happened post-WWII, they will crossbreed with the new demographic base created in the states, the result is the Frankenstein form of life at the core of the demographic base used by the Zionist beast.
Extinct Hominins resurrection
Anatomically modern humans started to exit Africa for the first time at least 60,000 years ago (ya). Along their journey across the globe, they encountered and admixed with other hominins that are now extinct, such as the Neanderthals or Denisovans. Given the deep divergence time between ancient hominins and modern humans, such admixture events left molecular traces in non-African populations that are still visible today in their genomes. Over the past few years, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that these segments of “archaic” DNA have the potential to contribute to phenotypic differences between contemporary individuals and populations.

I'm talking about Africans, Native Americans, and "Semitic races" as defined in part 1, respectively as the left-over genes of Homo Erectus and Neanderthals, of course, it is extremely politically incorrect to talk about extinct hominins and relate them to today's populations, people can't even stand the term: "race", it is like invalidating all the excavations, archeology and Anthropology finding, never mind, we are the same blood, just because modern humans were banging primitive kinds, but that's another story.

Africans and Semitic genes: The Core of the Zionist entity
Africans at their pure racial state before interacting with Europeans were pure brute, it is the occasional interactions with modern humans and the transatlantic slave trade that will shed a ray of light on the continent.

Africans will get a lot bigger, populous, and will acquire a lot more rights and even representation in politics and different institutions which will push for even more rights and integration, making it look like a rodent form of life, consuming the locals' resources and taking over by numbers. While this may not be considered as a resurrection, because Africans were never close to going full extinct, but it's definitely a new representation of the African race, different than the quasi archaic form of life existing in the mother continent. We may not call it a resurrection, but a certain type of recent days evolution or mutation induced by the interaction with modern humans, or as I called it in this post: "Second out of Africa".

Modern humans almost wiped-out Neanderthals from Europe, Nazi Germany was trying the systematic eradication of Jews from Europe, and the biggest genocide in the history of humanity of native Americans was by Christopher Columbus' men, it is like modern humans constantly trying to exterminate Neanderthals even in modern days' recorded history, that's why we may call the recent demographic shift in the planet a 'resurrection', those people were dramatically reduced in numbers and even went extinct in many occasion like no other living or extinct human kinds or hominins, this 'resurrection' is presented by the emergence of new racial groups at their core the genes of the almost extinct hominin, either its people with native Americans genes, Jews or all other Semitic kinds from Europe inheriting a considerable percentage of Neanderthal genes, (If you think 0.2-4 % of Neanderthal genes is insignificant to make any substantial difference, consider that modern humans share about 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees).
We talk about resurrection because of the shift in the populations of these groups from a minority in Europe and the Americas to what we see today of Frankenstein forms of life having at its core the genes of the extinct hominin but got improved, stronger and a lot more populous by the infusion of modern humans genes that happened post the discovery of the new world, and all other circumstances and efforts made to make this 'resurrection' successful.
The importance of procreation.

Religious background
Procreation, indeed, its obligatory nature, is a recurrent theme of the Hebrew Scripture. One need only consult the narratives of Genesis for confirmation of this proposition.
N.B. This is based on ancient scriptures and religious books, it is presented because that's what people believe happened in ancient times, it is cited for conformity reasons since this post is about demographics and reproduction, the core of these posts and blog is "Guided Evolution" Talking about Hebrew Scriptures is because they are always cited in parallels to other religious texts.
When God appeared to Abram—he was not yet Abra-ham—in Chapter Fifteen and promised to be his shield, Abram responded: “O Lord, what wilt thou give me, for I continue childless?” (Genesis 15:2).
When Rachel found herself unable to conceive, she lamented to her husband Jacob, “Give me children, or I shall die!” (Genesis 30:1).
The "Original Sin" and the story of Abel and Cain
Since we are in a religious context, we can't talk about procreation without signaling what is known as the "original sin" in religious Scriptures, it simply implies that:
By his sin Adam, as the first man, lost the original holiness and justice he had received from God, not only for himself but for all humans.
Adam and Eve transmitted to their descendants human nature wounded by their own first sin and hence deprived of original holiness and justice; this deprivation is called "original sin".
As a result of original sin, human nature is weakened in its powers, subject to ignorance, suffering and the domination of death, and inclined to sin (this inclination is called "concupiscence").
Source: Wikipedia
.
..And then Jesus died for their sins, which is really confusing, brief, religious texts are more of symbolic, stories and tales than real events.
F.T
"In the light of the questions that have recently been raised at the interface of human evolution and the doctrine of original sin, this theory of cultural transmission has, in the fourth place, the advantage in that it allows for a transmission of sin that moves both downward through the generations and sideways through human communities. This is important given the strong scientific evidence that there never was a single human pair from whom all current human beings are descended. Extrapolation from the DNA in the current human population suggests that there was a population bottleneck of at least ten thousand individuals. How might a first sin in such a community be decisive for the entire human population so that all came to share in the consequences of this first sin? This is a particular problem for the realist understanding of the propagation of sin, since all human descendants can no longer be supposed to share their sinful nature with the first human being in the realist sense that all Adam’s descendants were “in his loins” and therefore fell with him. In this respect, both federalism and the cultural model for the human race have an advantage, because they allow for the propagation of sin both vertically and horizontally through the human community. One might conceive of a first individual or couple of a broader human population who became aware of God’s calling and were therefore, by definition, the first who could be called “human” in the theological sense. They were therefore, by definition, the first human beings who could sin and from them a sinful attitude to life spread out both vertically and horizontally, potentially together with the consciousness of God, so that for all others—apart from this first person, couple, or community—consciousness of God was from the very first instance tainted by a consciousness of sin and guilt."
van den Toren, Benno. (2016). Human Evolution and a Cultural Understanding of Original Sin
It argues that the human race has being scientifically proven to be descending of many branches not a single couple and that the cited couple (Adam and Eve) may be a symbolic meaning of the first fully evolved humans or group of humans, which were the first to be aware of God's calling (divine connection) and by the way call themselves humans. which eclipse the concept of the garden of Eden, Adam and Eve, replacing it by the more plausible hypothesis of Adam and Eve being a symbolic representation of modern humans first to make the divine connection, and acquiring the knowledge of the difference between Good and Evil following the infusion of the divine soul and the teachings that go with it and the development of the human conscience, distinguishing themselves from other partially evolved kinds, which will take us to the story of Abel and Cain as a metaphysical representation of the struggle between human kinds at the Upper Paleolithic period.
Science favours the view that homo sapiens is unlikely to have descended from a single couple. It notes that new species are inclined to come from several instances of creatures that have reached a similar stage of evolution. In this context we note that Adam and Eve are not names as such: Adam simply means “man”; Eve means “mother of all the living”.
The story of the two sons of Adam; truly when they offered an offering, and it was accepted from one of them, and was not accepted from the other, that one said, "I will surely kill thee;" he said, "God only accepts from those who fear. If thou dost stretch forth to me thine hand to kill me, I will not stretch forth mine hand to kill thee; verily, I fear God, the Lord of the worlds; verily, I wish that thou mayest draw upon thee my sin and thy sin, and be of the fellows of the Fire, for that is the reward of the unjust."
But his soul allowed him to slay his brother, and he slew him, and in the morning he was of those who lose. And God sent a crow to scratch in the earth and show him how he might hide his brother's shame, he said, "Alas, for me! Am I too helpless to become like this crow and hide my brother's shame?" and in the morning he was of those who did repent.
The passage above cites the first occurring of the burial of the dead which is known to be practiced by early hominins and specifically Neanderthals, who roamed Europe before Homo sapiens, talking about the "first murder", is of crucial importance because it represents the first occurrence of the man-caused discontinuation of life at the opposite of the Genesis, which is the focus in religious books.
Archeologist Steven Churchill has found evidence that Shanidar 3 was killed about 50,000 to 75,000 years ago. He took a spear in the rib, a spear made by a human. Though the findings are scant, they do nevertheless suggest a theory that humans may have been actively involved in the downfall of the Neanderthal species, their closest resource competitor.
Note the reference to the 2 sons of Adam, while as we've seen above, Adam is a metaphorical persona that represents the advanced evolutionary stage of modern humans with a brain and a conscience able to make a divine connection and distinguish good from evil, this forcibly implies that Abel and Cain are more the faces of two different evolutionary lineages than literally brothers, people at that time were unable to separate two different kinds, the insinuation of 2 brothers is more of a symbolic reference to how anatomically close modern humans and Neanderthals in contrast to other hominins, if Abel depicts modern human and Cain Neanderthal or vis versa it is in reality not of a big difference, what matters is the symbolic representation of the first inter-species murder and burial, which is more of a metaphorical representation of major events same as it goes in many religious scriptures, they are more symbolic than real stories.
It is common knowledge that while the Old Testament is indeed highly metaphorical, it does actually track real historical and geological events. The Garden of Eden with its four rivers did, in fact, exist in southern Iraq and the great flood was real (it may have resulted from an asteroid impacting the earth during the Neolithic Age). The 6 days of creation follows fairly closely with evolutionary theory if one takes a more flexible definition of the Hebrew word yom (which can be translated as "day" "month" or "age" depending upon context). And so on...
So here's one theory ... what if Cain & Abel actually represented two closely related species — Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis respectively — both of whom descended from a common "father" Adam, the progenitor of the hominid genus? Cain, the elder (sapiens) murders Abel, the younger (neanderthalensis).
The roots of the use of the term "bro":The use of this term is implying the existence of Adam and Eve, Darwin was wrong and therefore there is no evolution, it is often used by other kinds to claim their humanity, at the basis of the old story of Adam, Eve, their sons, and the first murder, while it is a metaphorical representation of interspecies first murder or later genocide executed by modern humans on Neanderthals. Africans also use the term to claim that every humankind descended from Adam and Eve, we are just cousins, bros and homies.
The repercussion of the 'first murder' on recent history's events

Historically, all peoples warred. Our oldest writings are filled with war stories.
Archaeology reveals ancient fortresses and battles, and sites of prehistoric massacres going back millennia.
To war is human – and Neanderthals were very like us. We’re remarkably similar in our skull and skeletal anatomy, and share 99.7% of our DNA.
Behaviourally, Neanderthals were astonishingly like us.
They made fire, buried their dead, fashioned jewellery from seashells and animal teeth, made artwork and stone shrines.
If Neanderthals shared so many of our creative instincts, they probably shared many of our destructive instincts, too.
Natural selection and the "strong survive" still going on

Beyond its metaphorical representation, there is a perpetual conflict between human kinds that never stopped, and it is global and unbounded by any time frame, historical era, or geographic limitations, from the "first murder" and the Neanderthals' extermination to native Americans and Africans in the Americas, Jews and Armenians in Europe, in fact, the "natural selection" and conflicts for resources are still going on, the "strong survive" is regulated by the UN.
This is will be the cause of the obsession of other kinds about survival, it is a scare in their spirit that goes back to the Upper Paleolithic times, and throughout the history, until recent times when they got a lot more powerful and numerous thanks to the globalization, or as I called it their 'resurrection', now it's their revenge times on modern humans, that explains the obsession of "Semitic races" and other kinds about survival and their tendency to have a deep scare about killing and rape, translated into their violent behavior if not under control, (ancient times conquests and genocides do not go without abductions and rape, probably that's how their genes survived and transferred throughout time to modern days).
As cited ailleurs, the notion of human-made time is relative and even obsolete by cosmic standards. For example, events that happened hundreds of thousands of years ago are still engraved in lower kinds' minds like if it happened yesterday.
Demographics are modern days' "spearhead"
The "first murder" will 'evolve' into mass murder and genocide, repeatedly manifested throughout history, while murder or the action of killing another person from the same race is rampant throughout history, it acquires a special status and importance when its inter-species and of larger amplitude.
Procreation as a biological necessity.
Humans, like all creatures, have urges which lead to reproduction. Our biological urge is to have sex, not to make babies. Our “instinct to breed” is the same as a squirrel’s instinct to plant trees: the urge is to store food, trees are a natural result. If sex is an urge to procreate, then hunger’s an urge to defecate.
Humans, like all creatures, have urges which lead to reproduction. Our biological urge is to have sex, not to make babies. Our “instinct to breed” is the same as a squirrel’s instinct to plant trees: the urge is to store food, trees are a natural result. If sex is an urge to procreate, then hunger’s an urge to defecate.
Procreation in America is motivated by unholy reasons, often it is a mean and not an end.
Amongst all racial groups, breeding is not the goal, but the consequence of legal, financial, and sociological constraints, the result is that corrupted Evil offspring. Different reasons push Americans to breed.
Crossbreeding is no Alternative to Evolution

The procuration is crucial in defining the genealogy of populations, individuals, groups of people, nations, or a geographic area survival and degree of prosperity is conditioned by the genealogy of its inhabitant, and of course, it is the granting of the reproduction and continuity of any given human race.
Since life starts at the microscopic level, Genes mixing is decisive in defining the nature of the subject,
group of persons, racial groups and even nations, it is often used as a shortcut for evolution, and to conceive a 'Competition' to God's holy engineering which is modern humans, made the divine connection and hosting divine soul and spirit, partially evolved people crossbreed as a way to compete with God's design, which is an abomination and the ultimate sin, some kind of atheism to a certain narrowed extinct, because it contest the perfection of God's ultimate design using a shortcut for acquiring evolved genes, without deserving them, same as modern humans went through constraints and hardship to survive the old continent and build an infrastructure, without it partially evolved kinds won't survive, what makes it an abomination and the ultimate sin is that it is based on lust and perversion, probably that is the forbidden fruit Humans were supposed to avoid, as we will see later on, crossbreed is not an alternative for evolution.

As We've seen how there is a perpetual war or struggle for survival between different human kinds, and that modern humans are overpowering other kinds, we will assist at another form of warfare from those partially evolved groups: A genetical warfare, acquiring modern human genes for a better representation, melting in the demographic fabric of European nations, taking over by numbers, and as we've seen in recent days protests and refugees exodus, ultimately winning the demographic war fought perpetually since modern humans and Neanderthal slaughtered each other for territories and resources.
Procreation as a matter of survival:

Until recent decades, Europeans were prevailing in the world and dominating other races up until the 70's weed and interracial sex in America, civil rights movement, the end of segregation and other oppressive policies, the demographic composition of the planet was characterized by a relatively clear distinction between the major racial groups known to people: Black, White, Asian, and Native Americans later known as Mestizos or Hispanics after mixing with Europeans, we take America for instance because the same thing will happen in Europe ulteriorly or at lower pace and its the 2 major continents where this globalization or demographic shift will happen, Asia is containing its homogeneity same as Russia to a certain extent, Australia and Africa do not present a clear interest to our concern of the dilution of modern humans or European in Europe and America and the replacement of their population by a Frankenstein form of life, 'resurrection of extinct Hominins' even though Australia have known an important demographic invasion, we ignore central and South America for the same reasons.
We've seen above that a major conflict is going on between human kinds since the "first murder", modern humans were prevailing and dominating other kinds until approximatively the 70's when they unleashed Evil on humanity, by all the policies and concessions they made at civil rights movement, and later on probably, people who aren't brainwashed realized that was a mistake, judging by recent riots, BLM, Antifa, looting, and destruction of monuments and anarchy, mostly because this lower form of life sneaked its way into key posts and decisional positions.
It is evident that this lower form of life do not want to coexist but it wants to Take Over and destroy, the civil right movement in America wasn't an isolated act of unleashing Evil on humanity through genes mixing and access to key positions, the same thing happened in Europe minus the status of slavery, a predominantly black and white society, segregation, lynching, etc.
It is a well-orchestrated scheme to dilute Europeans (modern humans) and replace them with hybrid populations, having its roots in other, less evolved human kinds, either it is Africans or what I called in Part 1 "Semitic races".


"Never Again! they say.
The 'resurrection': populations replacement
The Topic of this series of posts is the "resurrection of extinct hominins", which means more of a "restoration of life" than the classical definition of "rise from the dead".
This resurrection won't go without [them] competing with modern humans in all the aspects of life on Earth, from all-over appearance, civilization, advancement... Bien entendue, from a subordination situation, competing won't be the right word, maybe mimicking is more appropriate.
It is well known that modern humans have risen as an advanced kind in Europe, built a unique of a kind civilization in the old continent, this primitive form of life will create a parallel world in the US, will make it as their fortress in their eternal obsession about survival.
Settlements in the new world

Spaniards and other Europeans were more about opening the gate of this final days battle between modern humans and Neanderthals' resurrection or Semitic races, using African slavery to build the foundations of the empire, it is more like the Homo Erectus in its advanced form and Neanderthals represented by the "Semitic races" finally catch up on Humanity advancement and built a parallel civilization to Europe in America. After all, the US isn't called a Judeo-Christian nation for no reason. Of course, all kinds of immigrants poured into the newly formed colony which will eclipse the nature of the primitive genes at its core, since people are lured into the impulses of temptation, Evil most successful trick is tempting humans, which explains the overall state of mind of Americans and why they are mentally corrupted, 70's civil rights movement, weed, and interracial sex revolution were a way of Semitic races (Jews in political positions) to force people into accepting Negroes as equal for a better dilution, extensive cross-breeding happened, Semitic and Brute-African traits vanished replaced by a Frankenstein form of life, miscegenation will break all natural laws of evolution and natural selection, to 'evolve' people will have to confront the constraints of procuring enough weed to survive an interracial selection.
Being human is evolving as further as it is possible from our initial animal state, being partially evolved is having a considerable animal side caused by a significant percentage of extinct hominins' genes, because the said hominins never evolved enough to make the divine connection, but stayed in a beast-like creature with no conscience, which makes it prone to corruption and to is used by Evil (the Beast).
Racial interbreeding disturbed this primary equilibrium. Mixes are indeed contemplated by Nature: the Armenid race comes from one of them. But this mix subsequently evolved, mutated and underwent natural selection by the environment obeying the tough laws of Darwinism, until it stabilised in a new racial type many millennia later. Disordered mixes, typical of globalist civilisation, have nothing to do with this natural laissez-faire envisaged by the natural order. Modern race mixing is an attack on human biodiversity and an aggression against dozens of millennia of evolution. In the times when life was pure and Nature followed her path unaltered, each race was walking its own path, straight ahead to become a different species. This was before the rise of materialistic civilisation, which perverted the natural order, consuming its hatred towards Nature and mankind, and materialising its resentment towards biological nobility by preaching equality and promoting chaotic crossbreeding. To mix with another variety is an abomination and an affront against all this work of perfection of natural and sexual selection of dozens of thousands of years.
To make things worse, primitive races feel sexually attracted to modern ones: a threat to evolution. Primitive races have an instilled instinct to procreate with the modern ones. This has been translated into millions of rapes and kidnaps of European women, including the unprecedented rape epidemics suffered today due to mass immigration in Europe and Oceania, and to the integration in North America and South Africa. The behavior of the primitives responds to the instinctive desire to improve the genetic code without evolution; that is, without the lengthy effort of undergoing a severe natural selection. It also responds to indiscriminate sexuality, developed to compensate with numerical quantity a lesser individual quality.
As to the debasement of white women there are numerous and illustrative examples, such as the Huns, Mongols, Turks, Tatars or Bolshevism. Another oriental occupation—Jewry—has behaved in a similar way in the western world through pornography, social politics, white slave trade, nightclubs, the fashion industry, music and subliminal propaganda. The purpose is turning the European woman into a commercial product and open her to the capitalist market, ‘globalizing’ her. This behaviour is understood when taking into account the desires of primitive races for enslaving the modern ones, acting in a vampirical manner over their genetics and obtaining economic benefits in the process. The genetic code is not improved by this kind of attacks on Nature. The mongrels would only benefit the most primitive race, whereas the noble becomes debased.The Nordids can only expect a backward leap of dozens of millennia in the evolution of their genetic code—and traumatising their genome forever if they crossbreed with other reproductive communities. If we consider how innocent and carefree modern races are (self-confidence in one’s capability tends to relax defences against much shrewder races), we are faced with a serious threat of human devolution.
The obsession of Miscegenation creates a Frankenstein-like form of life.

Miscegenation is abomination, the "inbreed" term is often used by colored and mixed people to designate and shame people who refuse to breed out of their race, since parasites form of life will go extinct without mixing with modern humans, same as the term "insecure" is used to designate people who object interracial mating.
The crossbreed that is of valuable signification for us is the one that is a mix between modern humans (Europeans), Negroes (Africans), and other Semitic races (Jews in all their shades, Native Americans, Mestizos, and Asian).
The majority of what's going on in Europe and in America, the only difference is the origin of the African and Semitic races that will mix with the locals (Europeans), in America it's slavery and Native Americans, in Europe it is more African Immigrants, Europeans, and Middle Eastern Semitic races.
Historical retrospective on Semitic races
African ancestry is evident and visible to the naked eye, while some Semitic races have been "absorbed" by certain modern human populations making them undetectable by their overall appearances, and others still present the Semitic traits, all mixes happened in between depending on how much admixture there is from Europeans, and how farther North they adventured away from Africa.
It is to be reminded that Semitic races as they are presented in these posts include Asian, Native American, and middle eastern as well, technically I won't consider Indian of Asian a Semitic race because, while their real distant ancestry is debated, they seem to be distant descendants of Aboriginal Australians, which are direct descendants of Africans, they didn't evolve because they stagnated on the big island.
"...the Aboriginal peoples have occupied the same territory continuously longer than any other human populations. These findings suggest that modern Aborigines are the direct descendants of migrants who left Africa up to 75,000 years ago. This finding is compatible with earlier archaeological finds of human remains near Lake Mungo that date to approximately 40,000 years ago."
...with a prevalence of Denisovan DNA, which makes them out of our field of concern, that of Neanderthals' genes.
A 2011 study found that Denisovan DNA is prevalent in Australian Aborigines, Near Oceanians, Polynesians, Fijians, East Indonesians and Mamanwans (from the Philippines)
This is just mean... |
This makes Asian Indians, just another type of Negroes with straight hair, probably because of inheriting a significant percentage of Denisovan genes, got their feature lightened up by mixing with British and Muslim conquistadors and by using Fair and Lovely. A remark must be made about the prevalence of Denisovan genes in other Asian populations, but they do not concern us as much as Neanderthals genes because of their limited impact on the world's demographics.
Because of the context in which this stratification is happening, Asian Indians won't be included in Africans, but for conformity reasons, we will consider them Semitic races, because not counted as Africans, neither modern humans and as consequence, we will fit them in "Semitic races", despite the prevalence of Denisovan genes in their DNA. Anyways, they have been infused by all kinds of genes during conquests and cross-breeding, but the Denisovan, cow's pee drinker Spirit is always there to stay.
Ancient Genes 'migration' and the formation of human kinds
Some 350,000 or more years ago, the group of hominins that would evolve to become Neanderthals and Denisovans left Africa for Eurasia.
A few hundred millennia later, about 60,000 to 70,000 years ago, the ancestors of modern non-Africans followed a similar path out of Africa and began interbreeding with these other hominin groups. Researchers estimate that much of the Neanderthal DNA in modern human genomes came from interbreeding events that took place around 50,000 to 55,000 years ago in the Middle East. Thousands of years later, humans moving into East Asia interbred with Denisovans.

Plus Asian countries are kind of homogeneous populations, their role in diversifying the world's demographics is very limited compared to Africans and other Semitic races.
Based on the abstract above, some conclusions about the origin of some of the world's populations:
"...much of the Neanderthal DNA in modern human genomes came from interbreeding events that took place around 50,000 to 55,000 years ago in the Middle East." This would be how Semitic races formed, in the middle east: initial interbreeding with modern humans, as a consequence they inherited a significant percentage of the extinct hominin's genes, then they will evolve depending on what region they reached, how much admixture they are subject to and if they are encountering any natural selection to shape their traits further.
"Thousands of years later, humans moving into East Asia interbred with Denisovans." This would be the formation of Asian kinds, same as Neanderthals' genes, Denisovans would end up totally extinct if not been absorbed by modern humans after being bred out. Asian people kept their distinguished look because they stayed in Asia, otherwise, we may end up with a whole different diversity in the world same as what happens when they crossbreed in the west, their mixing with modern humans is not as destructive as other primitive kinds, because they mixed up with modern humans after they reached different evolutionary stages depending on what region they are originating from in Asian, not like other kinds, they are in a primitive state and they 'evolve' by hijacking modern humans genes.
Modern Humans left the middle east adventuring farther from Africa and the Middle East north to continue their evolutionary path, while those who populated the middle east will be today's Semitic races, resulting from the initial interbreeding with Neanderthals and as a consequence significant Neanderthals genes.
Impact of genes "migration' on Semitic races

There is no other Anthropologic ancestry that is well present in the world demographics than the 3 cited hominins (ignoring Denisovan DNA, exclusive to Asian populations because of proximity reasons).

While Sephardic, Mizrahi, and Ethiopian Jews are no big deal because they represent the trait of Semitic races in the middle east, and as they mixed with the locals in different regions of Europe, happened a long time ago, due to populations movements and deplanement, Ethiopian Jews are more of a group of people adhering to a faith for the opportunities that it presents, same as it happened in Eastern Europe, post the collapse of Soviet Russia.
Ashkenazi Jews represent a special interest because they are relatively recently formed groups and their European appearance is different than traditional middle eastern Jews.
Ashkenazi Jews: 'The resurrection' as modern humans
“Ashkenaz” in Hebrew refers to Germany, and Ashkenazi Jews are those who originated in Eastern Europe. (Sephardic Jews, by contrast, are from the areas around the Mediterranean Sea, including Portugal, Spain, the Middle East, and Northern Africa.)
Overview of Ashkenazi Jews population
According to the scriptures, the Jewish people originated from Semitic tribes that lived in the Middle East approximately 4,000 years ago. In 587 B.C.E., after the defeat of the Judean kingdom, the Jews were dispersed and exiled into Babylonia and other areas. Recent population studies using genetic markers, however, support the common Middle Eastern origin of the Jews.
About 80% of modern Jews have Ashkenazi ancestry, according to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Albert Einstein was an Ashkenazi Jew, as were Gertrude Stein and Carl Sagan. Steven Spielberg and Scarlett Johansson are also Ashkenazi Jews, along with three current members of the U.S. Supreme Court (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan).
...Despite their close ties with Europe, no more than half of their DNA comes from ancient Europeans, the researchers found. Those ancient people split off from the ancestors of today’s Middle Easterners more than 20,000 years ago, with a founding group of about 3,500 to 3,900 people, according to the study.
The controversy of Ashkenazi Jews' ancestry
Eastern and Central European Jews comprise the largest group of contemporary Jews, accounting for approximately 90% of over 13 million worldwide Jews. Eastern European Jews made up over 90% of European Jews before World War II. Despite their controversial ancestry, European Jews are an attractive group for genetic and medical studies due to their presumed genetic history (Ostrer 2001). Correcting for population structure and using suitable controls are critical in medical studies, thus it is vital to determine whether European Jews are of Semitic, Caucasus, or other ancestries.
Genealogy of Ashkenazi Jews
...the Middle Eastern Jews and European/Syrian Jews – shared common ancestors in the Middle East about 2500 years ago. The study examines genetic markers spread across the entire genome and shows that the Jewish groups (Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi) share large swaths of DNA, indicating close relationships and that each of the Jewish groups in the study (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, Italian, Turkish, Greek and Ashkenazi) has its own genetic signature but is more closely related to the other Jewish groups than to their fellow non-Jewish countrymen.
The genealogy of "Semitic races" as presented in part 1 are all kinds who inherited a significant percentage of Neanderthals genes and as a consequence, are not modern humans nor Africans.
The equation is simple, there are 3 main hominins from which all human kinds existing today descended: Homo s. Sapiens, Neanderthals, and Homo Erectus. If you are not African or an advanced form of the homo erectus neither modern humans nor Homo s. Sapien, then you are a Semitic race because forcibly you have a significant percentage of Neanderthals genes which makes you a "Semitic races", otherwise you are modern human since you are not African, and you are not 'stained' by extinct hominins' genes in a significant percentage, (a minimal, insignificant inheritance of Neanderthals' genes by modern humans is noted throughout European populations and it seems that it does not affect the racial purity when at an insignificant percentage).
That's why multiculturalism and diversity advocates are working hard to dilute the planet: If you are not modern human neither African, you are not forcibly a Semitic race, you are a mix of 2 or more races and therefore you won't be "registered", the goal is to dilute the Semitic and African traits, getting absorbed by Whites create a totally diluted population or as they call it the melting pot, there is no more distinction between modern humans, Semitic races and Africans, same as there is no way to distinguish Jews from Gentiles.
Of course, Semitic races englobe many kinds, and this is to simplify, there are other evolutionary lineages that are not addressed because of their insignificant contribution to the world's demographics, such as aboriginal Australians and other isolated kinds. It is important to emphasize the definition of Semitic races because, while it was easy to make the distinction between modern humans and Semitic races, it is not the case anymore, mostly because of the crossbreed that sometimes happened under questionable circumstances, the end goal is to smooth the traits of the Semitic beast: That's why the genealogy of Ashkenazi Jews is of prime importance.
The major non-Jewish contributors to the ethnogenesis of the Ashkenazic Jews were Slavs, though there was probably also a minor Turkic strain -- both in the Caspian-Black Sea area (the descendants of the Khazars, a mainly Turkic group that converted to Judaism in the eighth century) and in the Balkans and Hungary.
The Rhineland and the Khazarian hypotheses
A major difficulty with the Rhineland hypothesis, in addition to the lack of historical and anthropological evidence to the multimigration waves from Palestine to Europe (Straten 2003; Sand 2009), is to explain the vast population expansion of Eastern European Jews from fifty thousand (15th century) to eight million (20th century). The annual growth rate that accounts for this population expansion was estimated at 1.7–2%, one order of magnitude larger than that of Eastern European non-Jews in the 15th–17th centuries, prior to the industrial revolution (Straten 2007). This growth could not possibly be the product of natural population expansion, particularly one subjected to severe economic restrictions, slavery, assimilation, the Black Death and other plagues, forced and voluntary conversions, persecutions, kidnappings, rapes, exiles, wars, massacres, and pogroms (Koestler 1976; Straten 2003; Sand 2009). Because such an unnatural growth rate, over half a millennium and affecting only Jews residing in Eastern Europe, is implausible—it is explained by a miracle (Atzmon et al. 2010; Ostrer 2012). Unfortunately, this divine intervention explanation poses a new kind of problem—it is not science. The question of how the Rhineland hypothesis, so deeply rooted in supernatural reasoning, became the dominant scientific narrative is debated among scholars (Sand 2009).
The Rhineland hypothesis actually explain the origin of Ashkenazi Jews by a divine intervention or a miracle and it is debated among scholars, this is fascinating if we consider those people consider themselves God's chosen people and now it seems that there is enough credibility to make such hypothesis taken seriously by some people. Otherwise, it is amazing, given the stats of their demographic growth are accurate, that they've known this abnormal population growth,
The competing “Khazarian hypothesis ” considers Eastern European Jews to be the descendants of Khazars (supplementary note S1, Supplementary Material online). The Khazars were a confederation of Slavic, Scythian, Hunnic–Bulgar, Iranian, Alans, and Turkish tribes who formed in the central–northern Caucasus one of most powerful empires during the late Iron Age and converted to Judaism in the 8th century CE.
Ashkenazi Jews: Ancient times diversity

Often the parental side is middle eastern and the maternal side is Slavic or European, all this is a plausible explanation of the existence of Ashkenazi Jews until people start talking about a dark secret, not a miracle at the root of the Ashkenazi Jews, while the mixing and conversion of Slavic populations may have taken place, there is conquest and mass abduction of Slavic girls, forcibly mix with the Semitic beast to soothe it's brute appearance to what is today white Ashkenazi Jews.
Historical and archeological findings shed light on the demographic events following the Khazars’ conversion. During the half millennium of their existence (740–1250 CE), the Judeo–Khazars sent offshoots into the Slavic lands, such as Romania and Hungary (Baron 1993), planting the seeds of a great Jewish community to later rise in the Khazarian diaspora.
People are constantly mixing, same as we have Negros lightening up their African features by mixing with White, or Hispanics' obsession about whiteness going on a crusade for white genes, Middle Easterners are no exception. The Ashkenazi Jews' special status is that they mixed with Europeans a long time earlier because of proximity reasons, that's why we have Ashkenazi Jews in Europe been absorbed in European and Slavic populations.
No comments:
Post a Comment