The series of posts called: "Floating petroleum: Dead fishes: the Take Over" will be 'interrupted' by this series of posts under the title: "The resurrection of extinct hominins [Spirit]: Because biodiversity matters." I was planning to make it one post, but it seems that it's better to divide it into small chapters/parts, the posts in the series "Floating petroleum: Dead fishes: the Take Over" were also long with a unique title, which won't give an apercu on the post contents unless you read the intro and recapitulation, also I noted some incoherence, repetitions, and omissions which I will try to correct when I have a chance to edit this blog/site content.

This series of posts will be considered distinct to a certain limited extent, it will not be as a continuation or transition between the previous and next parts.


Most of the parts will be "an aperçu" or a brief idea on the subject it's treating, the internet is rich with more detailed resources and analysis, the overall idea is to link the dots between different events geographically and historically separated even in the context of hundreds of thousands of years, and reach a conclusion which will shed the light on the extraordinary events we are living in recent days.
Please Note:

To avoid any confusion or misinterpretation, a distinction must be made between terms in their abstract meaning, while it seems that to a certain extent they may be considered similar, they depict the fluctuations of life, soul, or spirit around the body in different contexts or stages, from the simple medical resuscitation or reanimation which happen when a CPR (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation) is executed to resuscitate life in an unconsciousness person, none responsive but not clinically dead, to the more mythical aspect of resurrection or reincarnation passing by the more controversial procedure of restoration of life.
Resurrection is rising from being declared dead, it is more related to souls and spiritual spheres, reincarnation is more about spiritual manifestation in another body or entity, while restoration of life is about a more advanced stage of CPR, which is also mythical and represents reviving a subject that being declared clinically dead.

Reincarnation may be more suitable to depict these posts, considering that those people's spirit resurfaced in new appearances resulting from diluting the leftover of their genes in modern humans gene pool, the archaic spirit and core are there to stay smoothened by modern days miscegenation and camouflaging the traits of the brute. The noun [Spirit] is mentioned in the title to give a glimpse of the essence of these posts.

We are witnessing a demographic boom and populations replacement by some human kinds that were presumed extinct or almost wiped out, now they are the "new modern humans" on the planet. It is a Genealogical Resurrection (extinct hominins genes) or Demographic Reincarnation (isolated primitive kinds are the dominant kind in improved genealogy: The Take Over)
1- ANTHROPOLOGICAL BACKGROUND
2- DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE
3- SPIRITUAL CONTEXT
4- THE VICTIM CARD
5-THE CORONAVIRUS AND BIO-DIVERSITY
6- THE RESISTANCE
7-REFLECTION ON THE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
Recapitulation2- DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE
3- SPIRITUAL CONTEXT
4- THE VICTIM CARD
5-THE CORONAVIRUS AND BIO-DIVERSITY
6- THE RESISTANCE
7-REFLECTION ON THE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
1- ANTHROPOLOGICAL BACKGROUND

This is not the subject of this post since it will be addressed again in part 10, but it's important to point out the bipolar nature of the world, necessarily in recent history, despite the fluctuation in shifts of the balance of power between many regions, military or political alliances. Recently the US hegemony on the international scene is a marking trait of modern history, the formation of poles in recent decades, won't be about nationality, religion, geographic perspective, or military alliance, it will be complicated, because of the emergence of the Zionist entity in the international scene, which has a demographic base from all nationalities, religions, and creeds, with no counterbalancing entity or block to counter it, at least until the Syrian crisis.
Anthropological background
The traditional definition of races

In this post, I will be using the term frequently to present a certain group of people that aren't Caucasoid, neither Negroid. While Caucasians may be divided into categories by PC advocates disguised as scientists, the subject of this post is to demonstrate the existence of 2 sides of human beings, ignoring all anthropological stratification existing in between.

The Caucasoid race is known to refer to Europeans or White aka modern human, the optimal stage in the evolutionary process, the Negroid race refers to Africans or Blacks, which judging by many characteristics of their kind, either in Africa or in the modern world, are not modern humans, and no, it's not because of harsh climatic conditions and constant exposure to sunlight that they acquired their distinguished tan and hair texture, we don't even need to go into the skull, brain size comparison and the degree of the overall development they reached to state that they are not, Just some extremely tanned modern humans with really bad hair texture, let's just say that they didn't' fully evolve, as we will see in this post and in other posts in this site, they are an advanced stage of the Homo-Erectus and an Archaic form of the Homo Sapien, the Mongoloid group is said to represent Asian and Native American groups. Since we ignore the Capois and Pacific groups for conformity reasons, mostly because of their insignificant contribution to the global demographics' genes pool.

While Caucasian may embodies many stratifications, some people just don't fit in the class of modern humans and are classified as so just for proximity and conformity necessities, also because of acquaintance and extensive crossbreed which caused that their overall traits vanished overtime throughout history and as a consequence, they are classified as modern humans. Our concern is that a large population existed in proximity to modern humans in Europe and western Asia, and are not modern humans, neither Black nor Mongoloid, this group of people we will be calling "Semitic races" for the sake of conformity. For conformity reasons, because the term is debatable.
Semitic or Semites, debatable terms

1. relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
2. relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic.
I will be using it mainly to designate a group of people who aren't Caucasian neither Negroids, the criteria which I will be taking in consideration to define this group of people is Genetic anthropology in terms of considering people with a significant percentage of Neanderthals genes.

Geneticists have long been aware that certain diseases, from breast cancer to Tay-Sachs, disproportionately affect Jews. Ostrer, who is also director of genetic and genomic testing at Montefiore Medical Center, goes further, maintaining that Jews are a homogeneous group with all the scientific trappings of what we used to call a “race.”
While anti-Semitism typically refers to the hatred toward Jews, Semitic or Semites, per the commonly used definition as we've seen above, is a larger group, from different religious and cultural backgrounds, and as I will use it in this post it will refer to every Human being that is neither Negroid/Africans(Black) nor Caucasian/European(white).
"...the now mostly extinct notion of "Semites." Invented in the nineteenth century and essential to the making of modern conceptions of religion and race, the strange unity of Jew and Arab under one term, "Semite" (the opposing term was "Aryan"), and the circumstances that brought about its disappearance..."
Semites: Race, Religion, and Literature
PC advocates still believe in Adam and Eve story

As we will see later on, because the process of creation, evolution of life on earth and the speciation happened at the microscopic genetical levels, a tiny proportion of Neanderthals genes is critical in terms of defining what soul or spirit the subject is hosting, since as we will see in part 9, the notion of time is obsolete by humanity standard if put in the cosmological context, and the spiritual world knows no time or space boundaries.
"In truth, if the Semite represent the man of the South, with his moral exaltation and his theological mission, and the Aryan, in contra- distinction, represent the man of the North, with his intellectual expansion and his consequent aptitude for literature, science, and art; then, as the racial embodiments respectively of faith and reason, they present the bipolar aspect of man's superior nature, whose harmony is the effect and expression of well-balanced antagonism. In a sense, their rivalry is eternal, because it is elemental. Their opposition can never cease; for it is rooted in nature, and is simply a manifestation of that unresting interaction which characterises all her forms."
The Aryan and the Semite Author(s): J. W. Jackson
From Race to spirituality.

The divine soul won't be infused until we reach the optimal evolutionary stage of modern humans, inheriting extinct hominins genes may be considered as an impurity. It is difficult to make the distinction between human kinds, because of the ongoing extensive cross-breeding, and corrupted genes are not visible to the naked eyes.
These are rough sketches of two camps, concentrated at the margins of U.S. political culture. On the extreme right, Jews are seen as impure—a faux-white race that has tainted America. And on the extreme left, Jews are seen as part of a white-majority establishment that seeks to dominate people of color. Taken together, these attacks raise an interesting question: Are Jews white?
Racial purity matters, because it is Divine

"If you are not modern human neither Black, then you are at a middle stage of the evolutionary process between the Homo s. Sapien and the archaic form of the Homo sapien, putting it in an anthropological context, the hominin that is more advanced than the archaic form of the homo Sapien yet not homo s. Sapien is the Neanderthals. "
F.T

The difference in those people anatomical and overall traits is conditioned by how long/earlier they interacted and occasionally mated with modern humans along with the percentage of Neanderthals' genes that is involved in the composition of their DNA, that's why native American were a lot more primitive than Asians, along with the impact of interacting with modern humans, as far as we go north in Europe, the features tend to resemble those of modern humans, because of the perspective of evolving while adventuring north: the farther you are from the berceau of humanity, Africa, the harshest climatic conditions you will encounter, as the natural selection law dictate, the more advanced (evolved) you will be, that's why Russians and Scandinavian nations who built civilizations at below zero degrees are more advanced than other modern humans, on the other hand, the more they stayed close to Africa and mated with Africans because of proximity reasons, the more they will be having primitive traits with a genetic admixture of African and Semitic features, this explains the overall appearance of middle eastern after they crossbred with African slaves.
People that are not modern humans or white neither African or Black, as we've seen, they represent an advanced incarnation of the Neanderthals, we won't call them brown because they are neither black nor white as it is commonly the case, but I will be calling them the Semitic races, which includes Mongoloid races as well, the criterion I'm using to define that kind of people are the percentage of Neanderthals genes they have inherited and the consequent features defining their kinds.
Note that the context in which I'm using the term "Semitic races" or Semites is a lot wider than the traditional definition presented above.
The critical nature of inheriting Neanderthal genes

"Although the narratives of human evolution are often contentious, DNA evidence shows that human evolution should not be seen as a simple ,or branched progression, but a mix of related species. In fact, genomic research has shown that hybridization between substantially diverged lineages is the rule, not the exception, in human evolution. Furthermore, it is argued that hybridization was an essential driving force in the emergence of modern humans."
"In Eurasia, modern humans acquired adaptive introgression from archaic humans, which provided a source of advantageous genetic variants that are adapted to local environments and a reservoir for additional genetic variation"

Ever since researchers sequenced the chimp genome in 2005, they have known that humans share about 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, making them our closest living relatives.
google search
Modern humans are meant to prevail



These modern days events are concretizing the final days battle between Good and Evil, good is always portrayed as the divine righteous side and naturally is represented by modern humans, Evil is known as being the wicked beastlike side which is destined to corrupt and tempt good people into deviating from God's teachings, this looks like what happened in America and how their way of life, tempt and corrupt people from around the globe.
A final remark about Neanderthals genes:
Several direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies report how much DNA a person has inherited from prehistoric humans, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. This information is generally reported as a percentage that suggests how much DNA an individual has inherited from these ancestors.
Above, I made the suggestion/affirmation of the necessity of being pure-blooded modern human or Homo s. Sapien to make the divine connection, this implies having a DNA with no genetic 'impurity' from other extinct hominins, but the fact that modern humans and Neanderthals coexisted for a relatively long period of time in Europe makes the presence of the extinct hominin genes inevitable even in a tiny percentage (less than 1%).
Neanderthals have contributed approximately 1-4% of the genomes of non-African modern humans, although a modern human who lived about 40,000 years ago has been found to have between 6-9% Neanderthal DNA (Fu et al 2015).


The demographic composition of the planet and overall how humans are prevailing on earth is conditioned by the overwhelming genetic composition of the world's population.
We've seen above that humanity's golden era was when modern humans were the majority, after Neanderthals went extinct until the discovery of the new world as a crucial event, which as cited above will open Pandora's box in terms of genes admixture, now we are surviving a new era of humanity, what I called "resurrection of extinct hominins" will cause a demographic shift, and people who prevail are those who inherited significant percentage of extinct hominins, either Neanderthals or Africans, but they have acquired modern humans features because of the substantial amplitude of the crossbreed that happened after the discovery of the new world, and Jews destruction of Europe by manipulating the UK and the US and even Soviet Russia into punishing Germany and crossbreed with the locals making sure their kind is never a minority, so they won't be registered or segregated. This is huge in terms of demographics, and the overall nature of genes prevailing on the planet, as we've seen how Neanderthals genes been overtaken by modern humans in ancient Europe, in these modern days, mostly because of the higher fertility rate of those people and the populations' displacements and replacement we are witnessing, we may see the opposite scenario, Neanderthals and Africans genes taking over the planet while displaying modern humans features.
...Neanderthals may not even have truly disappeared, but instead have been assimilated into modern human populations. "We know, of course, that we have a genetic legacy from Neanderthals of about 1 to 2 percent, so there was interbreeding,"
These two genetic studies add to the extensive body of evidence from the fossil record, which indicates that Neanderthals are biologically distinct from modern humans. For a variety of reasons, some Christian apologists and Intelligent Design proponents classify Neanderthals and modern humans into a single group, arguing that the two are equivalent. But these two studies comparing gene regulation profiles make it difficult to maintain that perspective.
RTB’s human origins model regards Neanderthals (and other hominins) as creatures made by God, without any evolutionary connection to modern humans. These extraordinary creatures walked erect and possessed some level of intelligence, which allowed them to cobble together tools and even adopt some level of “culture.” However, our model maintains that the hominins were not spiritual beings made in God’s image. RTB’s model reserves this status exclusively for modern humans.
Based on our view, we predict that biological similarities will exist among the hominins and modern humans to varying degrees. In this regard, we consider the biological similarities to reflect shared designs, not a shared evolutionary ancestry. We also expect biological differences because, according to our model, the hominins would belong to different biological groups from modern humans.
Genes and Prophecy, because there is no diversity in non-pagan religions

While most US scientists think humans are simply smarter apes, at least 4 in 10 believe a creator "guided" evolution so that Homo s. sapiens are ruled by a soul or consciousness, a new survey shows. Scientists almost unanimously accept Darwinian evolution over millions of years as the source of human origins. But 40% of biologists, mathematicians, physicians, and astronomers include God in the process.


It will be modern Humans' divine mission to enlightens those people through crusades and knowledge.
Jews are a race: Jewism can't be embraced as a universal divine religion


Is Judaism a people or a religion? Or both? The belief that Jews may be psychologically or physically distinct remains a controversial fixture in the gentile and Jewish consciousness, and Ostrer places himself directly in the line of fire. Yes, he writes, the term “race” carries nefarious associations of inferiority and ranking of people. Anything that marks Jews as essentially different runs the risk of stirring either anti- or philo-Semitism. But that doesn’t mean we can ignore the factual reality of what he calls the “biological basis of Jewishness” and “Jewish genetics.” Acknowledging the distinctiveness of Jews is “fraught with peril,” but we must grapple with the hard evidence of “human differences” if we seek to understand the new age of genetics.
Jewism stayed on the side, while Islam and Christianity conquered the world, this will change in modern days, when Jews finally will execute their 'crusade' called diversity, and the modern days' exodus and populations displacements and replacement happening.
At least two theorists working separately have concluded precisely this: The Jews are surviving Neanderthals. What matters is the existence of such a premise, because it validates the question it seeks to answer: What explains the Jews? That Jews require a meta-explanation is the problematic premise, one that even Philo-Semites have sometimes fallen for.

The beast felt the danger, somehow it controls people's mind, and there was the crazy vague of refugees, which may be compared to a modern days' Exodus, or Jews expulsion from wherever they existed throughout history reversed, the Semitic beast is getting revenge of humanity after it took power through the Zionist occupied governments, and prevails in the world, this Exodus movement will be "Semitism safety card in Europe".
However, this appears to be a principally a Semite problem, concerning both Jews and Muslims. Thus if we can wipe out Neanderthal Genes, we also wipe out Judaism and Islam, as well as suicide bombers and other religious fanatics. We are in a politically incorrect territory."
Note de conclusion

Genes transmission and percentages of DNA happen at microscopic levels, it's not an exact science, a tiny fluctuation can make a difference on to which side you belong.
The recent globalization of the planet and genes' mixing will make it almost impossible to make a clear distinction between people, not as centuries ago, as it happened in Nazi Germany, now the whole world is colored population, with a massive input of extinct hominins genes in humanity genes pool. That's why it is crucial to point to the necessity to pay attention to the evil form of life in modern humans' appearances, seeking not reconciliation and coexistence, but revenge for been oppressed and almost wiped out by modern humans.
In Nazi Germany, when they were measuring people's skulls to determine their racial purity, there were no Africans, now even Africans have Homo s. Sapien skull and it is a part of the global Demographic shift the planet has known recently, that's why we talk about 'Resurrection'.
No comments:
Post a Comment