From nations to Blocs: WWII context still prevailing
The international scene most importantly from the geographic perspective is more resilient to change than it was before WWI, political constraints and development of organs doing the world's cop makes it harder to achieve higher ambitions than it was at the time of great conquistadors as Napoleon or Christopher Columbus or Alexander.
Those organs such as the U.N enforce the geographic panorama forged post-WWII and act as the grantor of the sovereignty of nations. The impartiality of those organs is highly questionable, still a certain politic stability reign in the world. Often on the side, different approaches developed to serve agendas, not of nations but of poles, overthrowing leaders and governments instead of direct confrontation are the trends in modern history, along with arming militias to destabilize regimes we don't like, such as ISIS and different other cases. The major geographic map is rigid to any change, so we don't change borders, we change regimes, this is the case of the Zionist empire (the U.S) maneuvers in the world, mostly to protege a geographic mistake called "Israel".
Desormais, those days we don't talk about conflicts between nations but between poles and blocs, is it an extension to the axis and allies pole? that's an interesting supposition.


































