This Demographic Perspective will seem like a repetition because the subject is aborded in different parts in this Blog/Site but as posted in the previous part, those are smaller parts I have to do to put the international relations and the bipolar world posts in a theological context from an Anthropological retrospective. Hominins' interactions and mating are what shaped modern demographics and Demographics decide the fate of any given geographic location, its populations, nation, group of nations, or bloc of nations, all the way to the formation of poles which are depending on how diversified they are [populations] Or how Human they are, this is mostly crucial in defining the sides in the ultimate fight between men and beasts. or Devine and Evil.
The West in this post and probably in other parts refer to the classical definition of the Western world as opposed to the East or in other terms the Occident and the Orient in general, moreover, it focuses on the countries and regions following the Zionist empire's footsteps (the US and Israel). This term may be used interchangeably with Zionism.
Zionism refers to the world orders that distinguish politics of the planet recently, governments, organs, and institutions under the control of Zionism agents, while traditionally Zionism is related to the Jewish religion and people, it is more expanded to a demographic composition from all backgrounds and nations in most of the western world, since the globalization of the planet and diversity caused the spread of elements with an Archaic core in modern humans appearance and they are taking control of most if not the whole western world, commonly said the ZOG or Zionism Occupied Government, it is like an infestation of Archaic genes in modern humans appearances planning to dilute the planet and replace modern humans populations same as what happened to Neanderthals, Denisovans, Homo erectus, Native Americans, Jews in Nazi Germany, and Africans in plantations or in Africa.
Archaic is used interchangeably with Primitive: primitive kinds present primitive traits because they inherited Archaic genes, we use Archaic to point out their primitive nature caused by the inheritance of Archaic genes.
Demographic perspective
Archaic genes are still around.
Archaic Hominins didn't evolve to survive natural selection or the confrontation with other Hominins yet they didn't go fully extinct, they been absorbed through their genes by modern humans through cross-breeding (archaic introgression) or existed in isolated areas away from potential predators and as a consequence the potential of a modern humans' genes infusion which explains their primitive traits, that's why Homo S. sapiens inherited more or less Archaic genes, which explains the existence of Semitic races.
In Africa, Archaic introgression was extremely intense and vague due to the specific nature of the African populations, the rich biodiversity in the continent, the fact that the bipedal motion happened there causing the ambiguity and the difficulty of assessment of Hominins or Hominids that existed, probably cross-bred with Archaic homo Sapien or even Homo Sapiens and went extinct without leaving a trace (ghost archaic introgression) or yet to be found by paleoanthropologists, but are [ghost archaic genes] inherited in modern days populations.
Modern populations: Archaic genes dilution is going on
Crossbreeding with modern humans is a matter of survival for people inheriting archaic genes, this explains the obsession with the globalization of the planet because diluting predominantly white nations will suppress the demographic weight of a kind that dominate them throughout history, immigration to more evolved countries will cause this genes flow and the overall improvement of primitive to not say Archaic traits, beyond institutionalized eugenics such as Racial whitening, Selective breeding, and such Eugenics programs forced by a government on the populations to achieve certain préétablis goals, either in populations control or improvement.
People with pronounced archaic traits will have their own Eugenic programs in the figurative sense of the term, they tend to intuitively adhere to approaches and traditions that will improve their primitive traits and dilute their Archaic features when procreating or planning to, that's why we find a tendency to be motivated or maybe dedicated to cause that genes flow, it is a matter of survival or extinction. Guadeloupe survived and saved her people, Neanderthals and probably other Archaic Hominins survived a theoretical extinction through their genes, African slaves improved their overall appearance and benefited from preferable treatment for having light features, Semitic races improved their overall appearances and melted better in a white society by cross-breeding with the locals and even going as far as the extreme practice of abducting Slavic girls.
Historical and archeological findings shed light on the demographic events following the Khazars’ conversion. During the half-millennium of their existence (740–1250 CE), the Judeo–Khazars sent offshoots into the Slavic lands, such as Romania and Hungary (Baron 1993), planting the seeds of a great Jewish community to later rise in the Khazarian diaspora.
Often the parental side is middle eastern and the maternal side is Slavic or European, all this is a plausible explanation of the existence of Ashkenazi Jews until people start talking about a dark secret, not a miracle at the root of the Ashkenazi Jews, while the mixing and conversion of Slavic populations may have taken place, there is conquest and mass abduction of Slavic girls, forcibly mix with the Semitic beast to soothe it's brute appearance to what is today white Ashkenazi Jews.
Improvised Eugenics: The Shortcut for evolution
Every race will try to improve its kind's genetics to the ideal of modern humans, which will cause a total confusion about today's demographics (it seems that the whole planet's populations are Homo S. Sapiens because diversity and dilution happened), while denying and even criticizing their distant roots, we see colored people with primitive traits (because of distant Archaic genes inheritance) Or Not (miscegenation) emerging in modern humans appearances, full of pretensions because they forged a new identity and they are the new modern humans now, while Homo S. Sapiens are outdated as a race, they are eclipsing them, and diversity is the new norm. We witness a certain arrogance of these new forms of life emerging out of miscegenation (modern days archaic introgression, considering the primitive state and Archaic traits of isolated populations), somehow they consider themselves better than modern humans or like a replacement, typical Beast reasoning and arrogance, it is never the primitive kinds simple mind, neither modern humans humility but a new spirit, arrogant pretentious and insolent, an Evil spirit in a new presentation, rise of the beast.
Chinese, Indians, Blacks, Hispanics, and all kinds of Semitic races are creating Frankenstein forms of life all around, when you bring up Anthropology, ancestry, genealogy, and limitations caused by inheriting Archaic genes, they present their ancestors, relatives, and people who didn't mix upfront, as a snake sheds its old skin, linking all the Archaic traits and limitations to them and creating the illusion that they are modern humans because cross-breeding is considered in their limited reasoning as a shortcut or substitute to evolution, their kind [with pronounced Archaic traits] doesn't mind hating on themselves as long as it's for the cause of their kind as a whole, melting in the host milieu (recently a bunch of liberals and Jews acquired modern humans features a lot earlier), 'evolving' and replacing the real Homo S. Sapiens' populations.
If you take Whoopi Goldberg for example, that's definitely not Homo S. Sapien and this stage is after decades and generations of altering the brute traits by cross-breeding and all kinds of genes flow. This is the improved 'evolved' version, It goes for many known figures in the States and the EU, including the US Secretary of Defense, NYC and London Mayors, even if they are mixed such in Obama's case, the Archaic core is there, at the white house and in the world's politics, Europe has its share of Archaic genes in key positions as well, it is less pronounced because of the prevalence of Semitic races instead of African populations, this is crucial as we will see further in this post in defining the planetary struggle between Men and Zionism (diversity), Archaic traits are there visible to the naked eyes but people are brainwashed and their vision is blurred.
You don't find modern humans with Archaic traits even if you go centuries back in time, in fact, modern humans have been always Homo S. Sapiens, those people are definitely not Homo S. Sapiens without having to go all the way to their initial state in Africa.
That's why we talk about miscegenation as a modern days' projection of Archaic introgression: isolated populations kept their primitive traits because of a significant Archaic genes inheritance, when discovered and the crossbred happened with modern humans, there was a vast genetical gap in terms of evolutionary stages, which makes it a smooth, 'evolved' version of the brute Archaic introgression.
Before the series of posts about human beings, modern demographics from a genealogical context and an Anthropological retrospective to trace the roots of modern populations' gene pool and the evolution of this biodiversity present on the planet, all the way back from the distant Hominins stages to today's demographics, modern populations' interactions, cross-breeding (modern days archaic introgression), movements, displacements, and replacement.
...Before the series of "Floatingpetroleum: Deadfishes: theTakeOver", which is about the invisible or must say the well-orchestrated silent invasion of people coming from countries with a certain gene pool to countries, until recently were inhabited by a "majority of modern humans". It has been proved in the following posts that it resembles an "Archaic genes inherited at a significant percentage" invasion of milieus with "a gene pool, a priori, quasi-majority modern humans' genes ", if put in a genealogical and Anthropological context. Besides the genealogical and microscopic levels, it is like an invasion of Archaic hominins (considering the crucial nature of inheriting Archaic genes at a significant percentage and ignoring all the change that happened during an obsolete time factor, compared to a paleoanthropological context-related time-span) of modern humans milieus.
That was followed by the series: "Theresurrection of extincthominins [Spirit]: BBM", its main focus is the anthropological background of these populations' movements and the forced miscegenation going on worldwide, which is far from being spontaneous populations movements but, in obscure reality, camouflaged by all other superficial reasons, the ongoing interactions between human kinds [taking in consideration an obsolete time factor of recorded history compared to the extremely large time span that caused life to exist on earth] it is a projection of "the ancient hominins struggle for survival" that we witness today, of course, adapted to today's circumstances and to the changes, genes flow, adaptations that happened between different human kinds in their different evolutionary stages to create this biodiversity in the Human races.
While Anthropologists totally agree that many Hominins never went totally extinct but been absorbed through their genes in modern humans' genome, even some populations still present signs of archaic genes traits and that was a lot more pronounced before the globalization of the planet, the discovery of the new world and the hysteria of diversity and miscegenation that followed WWII, because "Never Again", but it is politically incorrect to invoke such matters, "we are all Homo s. Sapiens", despite this statement being totally absurd.
Before the said series of posts, this blog/site was addressing international affairs and mostly the formation of poles and blocs in world's politics, with some notes about the theological aspect in international affairs, mostly the classical struggle between Good and Evil or Divine vs Satanic, as the holy books insisted on the existence of the said struggle and it is ongoing since the genesis of life on Earth.
This post will interrupt the ongoing posts in the series: "Theresurrection of extincthominins [Spirit]: BBM", which unfortunately is stalling, but just to make it better, since being in a milieu with mixed populations and they're proving me right each day passing by.
Anyways, this post will be another part of the posts: "The Bipolar world: Formation of the Zionism pole, Rise of the Beast", with the distinction of including a summary of different topics that have been posted on this blog/site, passages from previous posts will be included to make a certain coherence in the overall idea of this multi topics englobing post, it will present the idea of the bipolar world from an angle vaguer than the traditional international affairs and politics, notes from other topics related to Anthropology and spirituality will be included, because we can't disassociate the physical world from the spiritual one, necessarily knowing the critical demographic shift the world has known following the miscegenation and diversity mania, and how human values and decency are absent in today western societies because an Archaic spirit caused by an overall change in the genealogy of the world populations took hold of societies, politics, law, order, and even international affairs.
While the two cited parts invoked the history of international relations and the perpetual shift in the balance of power between many poles or blocs leading to the formation of major 2 poles or the bipolar world as we know it today, this part will go back into the roots of the formation of life on Earth, beyond nationalism, international affairs, borders, and politics, the origin of life on earth respect a certain pattern or natural order, "first life-forms generated were very simple and through a gradual process became increasingly complex", the overall idea is that there is a natural path that allowed life to exist on earth and not on other planets, it is sacred and must not be transgressed for it is the essence of the balance that keeps life existing on earth and the Universe upholding its gravitational forces in perpetual equilibrium.
This post will be divided into 5 small parts:
Anthropological aspect, Demographic perspective, Theological aspect, Translation into International affairs, and The Necessity to Prevail.
It is to be noted that the future parts in other series of posts have in general the same subject as the parts of this post, with the exception that the parts of this posts will be relatively short, a summary made to put the global perspective and international affairs in an anthropological related context.
Theological, Anthropological aspects, and Demographic perspective are or will be well detailed in other posts in the related series, the projection on International affairs will be in a considerable part extraits from previous posts with an added focus on Ukraine, the Necessity to prevail won't be detailed in this post, but will be addressed later on in latest posts of the petroleum spillage series.
It is to be noted that intrusion of concepts, events, and theoretically unrelated topics will occur in this post, since as it is presented in previous posts, the time factor is obsolete if we put recorded history in the time frame of the happening of life on earth, even more in a cosmic retrospective, for example, BLM and Antifa will be mentioned while talking about natural selection, talking about Hominins, archaic introgression in the context of migration, populations replacements...etc.
The use of the terms Archaic genes or Archaic people must be considered with extreme precaution, it will sound definitely out of context in any other site, text, or article, in this Blog/site it is used often to describe people who inherited significant percentage of Archaic genes, but have been improved by modern humans genes throughout diversity, which presents them as modern humans in appearances with an Archaic core.
The term Neanderthals will be used often: It is used in the context of posts in this Blog/Site: people who inherited significant percentages of Archaic genes (Neanderthals, Denisovans, or Homo Erectus: African ancestry) and either cross-bred with modern humans and present more evolved features, or at their primitive states, either through geographic isolation or other reasons.
Anthropological aspect
The planet since the dawn of humankind as the dominant specie on Earth, as far as recorded history goes and even in speculative assumptions and conclusions, may be divided into 2 shifting sides, progress and primitivism, decency and perversion, modernity and backwardness and the eternal fluctuations between these 2 extreme ends present the fight between Good and Evil, that was going on since the earliest hominins start splitting apart from Hominids, the formation of human conscience and the Devine connection which will guide human beings to the right path, and the opposing Evil side which will try to take control of kinds that didn't make the Devine connection neither been enlightened by modern humans. Since the dawn of the existence of humanity as distinct from other forms of life, there was a struggle, probably invisible between the Devine and Evil sides.
The fact that natural laws hold the universe together and allow for the appearance of human life, and that the theoretical odds of such laws occurring by chance are infinitesimally small, leads to the idea that the universe and the Earth were designed for humanity. That idea encourages millions of believers to jump to the conclusion that there is a Universal Designer - in other words, God.
Natural laws caused the existence of life on earth
There is a constant struggle for survival between the different forms of life, whether it is human, animal, or other forms, happening in all the different evolutionary stages, it is even the essence, the catalyseur of the formation, existence, and thriving of life on earth. Without this perpetual confrontation between different kinds [and sides], human life won't form, evolve, and thrive, as per the great principle of natural selection and survival of the fittest, there is a constant struggle and confrontation between different kinds, this struggle and confrontation is even at the core of formation and evolution of forms of life.
As cited ailleurs, an equilibrium must be respected to grant the stability of the universe and cosmic laws to be upheld, this equilibrium is made possible because of the said principles of natural selection, once these principles are transgressed, we pass from a struggle to exist to a worry about coexistence, the laws that made life evolve and humanity thrive are transgressed.
This is what has been happening since the dawn of life on earth, from the overall jungle law in the Dinosaurs era to the struggle for resources between different hominins causing the extinction of the weakest, homo S. Sapiens stood at the throne of living beings on earth. Throughout history, there was conflicts between kinds, a constant instinct of survival will push people to confront, wage wars on different kinds because of survival instincts, a struggle for resources and territories, or all other reasons are rooted in our essence of evolved human beings to fight other different forms of life, wars were going on, the rule of the survival of the fittest was enforced, modern humans prevail in the world, other kinds existed as marginal forms of life until the discovery of the new world.
Natural selection and the survival of the fittest are crucial
Evolution happened because Hominins adventured and faced natural and other constraints which caused an overall progressive change and adaptation, what we are witnessing today of populations displacements and replacement, mostly people coming from a more pronounced Archaic traits population pouring into modern humans' countries, is totally against the laws of nature that caused life to happen on earth, those people are exploring new territories not to create resources, survive, advance, and develop their kinds but to live on modern humans resources, social security systems, and development, this is not causing any positive change for both the locals and the invading 'Hominis' (Put in the context of this post, Anthropology, introgression and miscegenation) but causing the locals to downgrade their standards to accommodate the lower forms of life amongst them, they have to adjust to, because there are policies passed by early thinkers who inherited significant percentage of Archaic genes as well, but they are different because they coexisted with modern humans in Europe long enough to dilute their features, develop mental abilities digne of modern humans, while they are hosting the spirit of an Archaic beast.
This is totally against the laws of nature and the principle by which the universe keeps its equilibrium and the long-term effects are imminent doom of Humanity because miscegenation is not an alternative to evolution as we will see in other posts on this site.
The order of the natural laws should never be transgressed
The survival of the fittest is what caused evolution and life to happen as we've witnessed it, life exists on Earth because natural selection happened, that's how humanity survived, thrived, and prospered, changing those ways is messing up the natural equilibrium that made life possible.
When genetically limited people are in charge of resources, laws, and decisions making same as we've seen recently of uncontrolled populations movements, lawlessness in the distribution of resources and the development of a dependency system instead of people trying to create their own resources, they just pour in western countries to consume resources made available for them by an ongoing scheme to dilute the planet starting with the western world, because modern humans purity and supremacy are lethal to their kind, this dependency will disturb the natural order that caused life to happen on earth, which is surviving, creating resources, thriving, evolving, and building civilizations, otherwise going extinct or surviving a quasi primitive life in isolated areas, definitely not surviving on modern humans resources, if the principle of survival of the fittest or natural selection is transgressed we will witness the development and thriving of passive, a Parasite forms of life, which has nothing of human. because being human's essence is to create resources, reproduce (the only common point they have with humans), and thrive, it is more similar to an animal form of life going after basic instincts and benefitting from the global petting program created worldwide by globalists and corrupted elements in modern humans appearances and Archaic core infesting the western world, if Taken Over the planet it is certain doom.
Archaic ancestry is destructive: It is pushed on Modern humans
It is the natural path of life on earth that more evolved people prevail, otherwise, it's chaos same as we've seen recently during BLM and Antifa global upraise or the "left take over of western societies":
The demographic shift in the US and the overall western world populations toward a colored majority or at least mentality for now, is caused by what is commonly called diversity or miscegenation, pushed for by actors in key positions pursuing a dark agenda aiming to dilute the whole planet's populations and make modern humans a minority instead of being the optimal form of life that is destined to inherit and rule Earth, which is [miscegenation] simply a modern days projection of the Archaic introgression that happened when modern humans cross-bred with Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other unproved ghost introgressions, this will cause a radical change in the ways of human life, values, and laws that used to regulate human beings existence, this is because it is predestined for more evolved forms of life to prevail, inherit and control the resources, otherwise, it is chaos and a projected long-term doom.
"Welfare system, are necessarily abused because some dark forces want to dilute the locals is against the natural evolutionary path, shelters, projects, and all the advantages those people are given as soon as they pour in a foreign country are proof these people still didn't evolve, the effects of Archaic ancestry is that those people cannot be self-sufficient in their native land and even when modern infrastructures are built for them. Humans evolved when they confronted natural constraints and extracted resources, that's how natural selection works, those people the only constraint they are confronting is the physical border and processing they have to go through and the line at the welfare office, for colored locals, they failed to create resources in their homeland, they are pouring into industrialized nations to live on their social security systems, nothing to see here, just the natural selection went extinct."
It is a struggle between human kinds, the closet hominin to modern humans are Neanderthals, which explain Semitic races and Zionism's relative success in confronting modern humans. and most importantly the hidden nature of the struggle, often it seems that it is mostly between black and white while Semitic races were all along around modern humans since the extinction of Neanderthals wasn't complete, they learned humans ways, how to manipulate, corrupt, deceive, and backstab, and most importantly they're genes been absorbed by modern humans, causing modern humans features, with an Archaic core.
“The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength with the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus, it denies personal worth, contests the significance of folk and race, and thereby withdraws from mankind premise for its existence and culture.”
― Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
Hitler's Quote, talking about the mass of numbers and their dead weight, and "it denies personal worth", this is a clear prediction of Zionism's getting a solid supportive base using the demographic weight, it stands on a massive base of colored background improved by Jews policies and forced inclusion, corrupted and indoctrinated locals along with the infiltrated Zionist agents in key positions.
The constant struggle for resources on earth: there is no Utopian world
"Restricting analysis of fossils to specimens satisfying these criteria, patterns of dental development of gracile australopithecines and Homo habilis remain classified with African apes. Those of Homo erectus and Neanderthals are classified with humans." (Holly Smith, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol 94, 1994, pp. 307-325. )
Anthropologically speaking Homo erectus and Neanderthal are classified as Humans, just the same as the Homo Sapien sapiens or modern humans.
Hominins gone extinct, populations get exterminated, genocides happened, the physical aspect may be crushed, but not the spiritual essence. Out of microscopic forms we evolved to what we are as modern humans inheriting Earth, and so Hominins or Archaic humans, out of genetic traces, crossbreed, hijacking modern humans body, their spirit will resurface, gain strength and numbers, and confront the divine spirit (modern humans) for dominating it as a kind since the Upper Paleolithic Period, for their essence is the beast, the entity the divine teaching warned us about, and it existed as long as there was life on Earth and the universal struggle between good and Evil, or men and the Beast.
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist
...In old movies, some kinds with primitive traits (people's knowledge at that time was limited, there was no eugenics or a distinction between human kinds other than African and none African) are portrayed next to modern humans, are known to be wicked (wise more commonly speaking), having sneaky ways and infiltrating all around, often portrayed by a long hooked nose and bulky body structure, known to be Jews or not just marginal groups of people who are different than the locals, there was none or rare Africans existing around modern humans at that time, there was no Darwinism, the most common criterion was skin color or difference between Humans and Blacks. Anthropology and this site will prove that they are Neanderthal genes remains in different appearances, they are known to be a minority and highly manipulative of the locals.
The cited features of a hooked nose, bulky or thick body structure with a thick skull or not, along with the predisposition of getting fat are the smoothened state of the brute Neanderthals leftover in isolated areas or as marginal groups beside modern humans. As evolution is passing from the brute to the smoothened features as domestic dogs evolved from wolves, modern humans from a more brute homo S. Sapiens, Neanderthals left over will be a more 'evolved' version of the brute Archaic hominin, it's the marginal, different people that existed around modern humans since forever, their features depend on the degree of isolation and/or the extensive cross breed with modern humans and how earlier it happened, either in the Americas, Asia, Europe, or the middle east, all kinds of Archaic ancestry is present depending on the geographic location, which Archaic genes inherited (Neanderthals, Denisovans, or African ancestry) and the extent or how early the exposure to modern humans genes happened. That's why we find people with clear Semitic races traits all the way to Ashkenazi Jews with modern humans features. Nobody can assess that Archaic hominins went totally extinct, because cross-breeding was happening earlier than recorded history and the remain of Archaic Hominins didn't vanish but were absorbed or improved by modern humans genes.
Their survival depends on their plots and cross-breeding with the locals, even though throughout history, they have been prosecuted, oppressed, and expelled, they managed to exist more or less around modern humans in Europe and the middle east, with light or dark features depending on who they mixed with, either in their raw primitive state in the middle east, eastern Asia, or the recently discovered populations in the Americas, those people presented the signs of intense Archaic genes inheritance, and they used to exhibit pronounced primitive traits in the centuries following the discovery of the Americas, mixing with African or the locals for lighter features as long as we go north or west, their genes been absorbed more or less by modern humans, they will infest the gene pool of Europe, America, and the world, of course, I'm talking of Semitic races in their earlier appearances before miscegenation cause their feature to disappear gradually.
Evil, the "Beast spirit" will be in a subordination situation on the planet, and mostly contained (segregation, strict immigration policies, a demographic composition with borders well defined depending on the racial group: Africans in Africa, Asians in Asia, Native Americans in the Americas, and modern humans in Europe, Jews and other Semitic races or people who inherited a significant percentage of Neanderthals and Denisovan genes to cite only the Hominins proven to have caused an Archaic introgression in modern humans genome, were scattered all around Europe and the middle east, but as history has shown, they were isolated and contained, until Hitler era which will be the cutting edge).
Divine Soul vs. the Beast Spirit:
If you sum it up, it's like some kind of conflict between modern humans or Homo S. Sapiens, and other kinds descendants from lower hominids, its same Archaic ancestry thrived in different levels of mixing with modern humans, Zionism policies without the support of the demographic weight of colored people to dilute and dumb down the population are vain, colored people know they are granted more rights and treated like God chosen people, and all that positive discrimination and affirmative action crap because Jews and Zionism using them to weaken up the local populations or the host milieu and this goes worldwide, the latest example is the vague of refugees, which is simply another major card of Zionism to create a quasi civil war in Europe, " the Locals vs Muslims", so there will be no more anti-Semitic attacks and the focus will be on anti-Islamization and Right Wings won't even think Antisemitism.
Recent population displacement or replacement along with the diversity and dilution going reflect the Neanderthals' resurrection [spirit] and Take Over of the planet, mirroring what happened during their theoretical extinction which was in fact a dilution or absorption by modern humans, the same has happened in the Americas at a lesser level. This is why it is about the resurrection of extinct hominins and the extinction of modern humans. The whole world is taken by White looking Semitic races dumping more and more Archaic genes on the locals' gene pool, the Great Dilution is going on.
This is the essence of miscegenation or diversity, a shortcut of evolution that should never have happened,
If you pay attention to the pic above, you see Meghan's mom's ancestry stopped at a phase far behind Harry, while his ancestry evolved 2 more stages (metaphorically speaking to simplify) Meghan's father is white, that is how she passed the 2 missed evolutionary stage, and the baby, as well as all the on ging miscegenation's offspring are a hybrid form of life, a shortcut of evolution made up to replace modern humans.
Innocent mixed baby you say, Harry is already speaking about changing the world to suit these forms of life and millions like him are in key positions, doing the same thing, replacing human beings with Frankenstein forms of life.
You must understand that the Beast is an umbrella denomination for the rise of Evil in the world, its like a spirit with no specific racial or national appurtenance, controlling all the hierarchical structures from the homeless harmless looking person to the elites, decision-makers at the White House, E.U, and NATO, the common point, they both host the evil spirit, that, bien entendue, its first rule is to never be uncovered.
The Plague of Archaic genes inheritance in modern populations
This page/post is included in this series of posts as an annex because a transition must be made between the "GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE" and the "PRACTICAL APPLICATION ON DEMOGRAPHICS" Parts in terms of emphasizing the aspect of modern days' miscegenation as a long term's projection of archaic introgression, to a limited extent of course, the presence of ghost Archaic ancestry in African populations will be on the spotlight as well as the Neanderthals and Denisovans archaic ancestry which is more diluted because of the earlier encounters and extensive interactions with modern humans.
The GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE part was more about interactions between human kinds in terms of genes flow throughout distant history and how proximities and settlements define the genetic fabric of a given population, this post/page will be addressing genes flow in ancient and modern times, the correlation between and the projection of archaic introgression on today's demographics in terms of the focus on the hypothesis/affirmation that today's miscegenation is no different, relatively speaking, than the archaic introgression that happened at the Paleolithic period, because some of today's populations incarnate the leftover genes of theoretically extinct hominins that [Genes] transcended through "ancient to modern" times to end up either isolated or using more advanced human beings as vessels to make a shortcut for evolution (which defies the laws of natural selection that caused evolution and life to happen and thrive on earth), this makes miscegenation as a modern days' light version of archaic introgression.
This will lead us to the conclusion this series of posts is about "the resurrection of extinct hominins" because people who inherited archaic genes hijacked modern humans' genome to present a more 'evolved' form of life aka diversity.
The page "Erectus Walks amongst Us" presented a brief remark about the Archaic introgression in African populations, the "Out of Africa event" vs. the "Out of Asia Hypothesis", argued scientific racism basic claim about biodiversity in Africa and "lack of diversity" in today's populations, which presumably suppress the concept of "race" and force the made-up notion of "social construct" on the planet.
The difference between archaic ancestry in Africa and Neanderthal genes inheritance in modern humans, the overall idea being that "Erectus Walks Amongst Us" is a metaphorical expression to point out the primitive to not say Archaic nature of African populations.
This page/post's focus will be on the "archaic introgression" projection or "transcendence" (as it is used in this post see definition below) into today's demographics in terms of the miscegenation going on today. Miscegenation is cross-breeding or vertical genes transfer between groups of different racial origins, which is [racial difference] a transcending projection of Archaic introgression on today's populations, and that makes it a modern-days' introgression even archaic to a certain extinct if the concept of race is based on genetics difference between human groups, as every sane person must tend to assume.
Please Note:
The Archaic introgression in this post, it is the projection of the Archaic traits we are talking about as it 'transcended' into modern days isolated populations, and it doesn't have to be in the sense "Archaic genes introgression into modern humans genome", per the classical Anthropological definition of Archaic introgression as it happened with Neanderthals and Denisovans, it [Archaic introgression in this post/blog] refers to genes flow between modern humans and primitive people, because of the size of the surviving populations who inherited significant percentage of Archaic genes translated into traits, and as a consequence, they won't go extinct because they survived through their genes in modern human causing the existence of Semitic races in their different appearances depending on the percentage of Archaic genes inherited and the degree of isolation of populations. Today's Archaic genes flow context is different, they largely overpopulated in their isolated areas or diluted their features in Europe, gained enough power and influence on the locals to create the proper atmosphere for the "GREAT DILUTION" of modern humans' genome by encouraging miscegenation, which is a long term echo of ancient introgression, by pushing for population displacements and replacements, and what was Archaic introgression in stone ages, its happening today, probably in the opposite way under the smoothened denomination of miscegenation or diversity.
A glossary of the often used terms: Miscegenation: The interbreeding of people considered to be of different racial groups. Archaic introgression: Describes the incorporation of alleles from one entity (species) into the gene pool of a second, divergent entity (species). Hominins: Members of the lineage leading to modern humans: Homo erectus, Neanderthals, Denisovans, Homo s. sapiens. Pre-Columbian and Post-Columbian eras: before the arrival of Columbus in 1492 to the new world, and After the discovery of the Americas. Genes Flow: The exchange of alleles between two or more populations. (dogs example): One dog from a specific population is allowed to breed within a pure-breeding group, new alleles are brought into the mix. The gene pool is expanded, and new varieties are seen. Thus, the labradoodle has a Labrador mentality, but has Poodle hair. Transcended (as it is used in this blog/site): projected from the paleolithic period to concretize into today's populations (ignoring the time factor).
"Several studies have provided evidence that extinct species can live on in the genomes of present-day species".
"Ancient introgression events can leave traces of extinct species in present‐day genomes, a phenomenon known as ghost introgression"
~~Jente Ottenburghs
Anthropological background
Evolution and genes flow are not an exact Science
Modern humans first evolved in East Africa about 200 thousand years ago. By roughly 70 thousand years ago, they had replaced or marginalized all of the archaic human species. The final remaining archaic populations died out by about 28 thousand years ago. This period of human evolution is confusing because of the diversity of human species, their recurrent migrations, and interbreeding among different species or subspecies, including Homo sapiens. At present, there are no clear lines of demarcation between Homo heidelbergensis and archaic humans, nor between archaic humans and modern Homo sapiens.
We Homo sapiens didn't used to be alone. Long ago, there was a lot more human diversity; Homo sapiens lived alongside an estimated eight now-extinct species of human about 300,000 years ago, until as recently as 15,000 years ago
"We have one human species right now, and historically, that's really weird," said Nick Longrich, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. "Not that far back, we weren't that special, but now we're the only ones left."
This is some kind of the none sense scientists are preaching: "Long ago, there was a lot more human diversity, and now, we're the only one left" somehow they are just ignoring Archaic introgression and dilution or absorption of genes, that happened and well recorded. or they are just ignoring isolated populations and judging them as not human enough to be considered as inhabitants of the planet.
Miscegenation: a smoothened aspect of the "brute" Archaic introgression
Archaic introgression is more or less recorded and scientifically proven, there are cases of well-known and recorded genes' flow, and cases that are yet still to be proven, and probably cases that we do not know about but it is reflected in today's populations' genome.
Cases of modern-day's Miscegenation are well known and documented, the practice of genes mixing between 2 different racial groups has known ups and downs, from a taboo punished practice to the hysteria of miscegenation and diversity as a way into modernity.
Archaic ancestry in this post/page does not focalize on the insignificant inheritance of Neanderthals genes, because it does not alter the purity of modern humans' genome, since probably it was supposed to happen, in the sense that homo s. Sapiens' genome will be complete by some Neanderthals infusion without altering its status as the optimal evolutionary stage. It is crucial [inheritance of Neanderthals genes] when it is significant in terms of altering modern humans' features and the exhibition of Archaic traits, which represent what I called in this blog "Semitic races", it englobes all non-African populations that do not present typical modern human traits: Because they inherited significant percentage of Archaic genes.
We are talking about Neanderthals' genes infusion as an archaic introgression transmitted into today's populations, Denisovans' genes to a certain extent as well, because in case of recent days miscegenation, (despite the subject is a long term, more developed projection of a more pronounced archaic introgression), the subject acquires modern features without being truly fully evolved (modern human), as we've seen in previous posts about Jews with modern humans features.
While miscegenation may be considered as a modern day's projection of archaic introgression in terms of the evolutionary gap between human kinds, it is Not an alternative to evolution, same as Semitic races are not modern humans despite their features being diluted.
Retrospective overview on Archaic hominins and introgression
Before addressing archaic hominins and introgression, a brief overview on archaic forms of life s'impose, along with emphasizing the distinction between African and non-African populations.
Part 2 will be: "The Plague of Archaic genes inheritance in modern populations"
Part 3 will be: "Projection on Ancients and modern Demographics"
Part 4 will be: "THE GREAT DILUTION"
"Erectus Walks Amongst Us"
This is brutal
Click the Pic to understand the partially evolved state of the African race.
This page is supposed to support the hypothesis of the Archaic ancestry in African populations.
It is based on the cited book: "Erectus Walks Amongst Us". while I went through it overview style, I didn't read the whole book, that was a long time ago (around 2012), it has catching and convincing arguments from a scientific basis, reflected on the reality of cultural Anthropology and the situation of the African race in the modern world.
This is an update of the page
What is brutal is that I posted a link to the PDF version of the 588 pages book to present the partially evolved state of the African race without any abstract or a short presentation of the hypothesis, I guess I didn't give this page much attention or I was busy doing something else.
Below are some abstracts from the cited book, which focalizes on the Idea that Homo Sapien and Homo s. Sapiens evolved in EuroAsia, while Africans stagnated in Africa.
In this Section, we examine the Out-of-Africa (“OoA”) answer to the question, “When and where did man become modern?” About 2 mya Homo erectus inhabited Africa, Europe, and Asia. In one of those locations he evolved into an archaic form of our species, Homo sapiens (Hs), then into modern man, Homo sapiens sapiens (Hss) and the people living today.
We will call the promoters of OoA, the dominant theory of our time, “afrocentrists.” They believe that it was the African erectus that evolved into Hs and that Hs evolved into Hss in Africa, then those modern African Hss migrated out of Africa “replacing” all the more primitive people who were then living in Europe (Neanderthals) and Asia (Homo erectus). Once those modern Africans moved into Eurasia, they lost all the African traits described in Section II and evolved all the Eurasian racial traits we see in today’s Asians and Europeans. That theory is consistent with egalitarianism because OoA holds that not very long ago all modern humans were Africans, so recently, in fact, that everyone is still virtually genetically the same, and therefore equal, particularly in behavior, intelligence, and the capacity for learning, but excepting “very superficial features like skin color and hair form.”.
Genetic differences between populations are of no biological importance, however, only if they are neutral, i.e., they have no effect on the reproductive success of those populations. But, as Section II shows, genetic differences between races, including skin color and hair form, were the result of natural or sexual selection, which means that they did affect reproductive success.
The principal competing theory, the Multiregional theory, is out of favor and is clung to by only a few die-hard scientists. And last, there is the theory presented in this book, which holds that Hs and Hss evolved in Eurasia (Out of Eurasia, “OoE”), not Africa. That theory will be presented in Section IV.
It is crucial to note the approximative aspect in Anthropology, and the question that remains is: where hominins became modern man: is it in Africa or in EuroAsia?
I am not oblivious to the fact that the theory of human origins proposed in this book contradicts a vast literature supporting the Out-of-Africa (“OoA”) theory. However, there are good reasons for believing that OoA is not correct and that modern man did not evolve in Africa. I hope the reader will impartially judge the case presented while I anxiously remain in the dock, awaiting the verdict.
Even Though I adhere to the theory that Homo Erectus evolved into Homo Sapiens and Homo s. Sapien after leaving Africa, which justifies the primitive state of the African populations because simply they didn't evolve, what follows in this post is based on the "Out of Africa" theory.
Timing is important, Archeologists findings and Anthropologists speculations are relatives, what matters is that modern human evolved after exiting Africa, otherwise, we will find modern traits in the African populations which is not the case, justifying dark skin and hair texture by adaptation to climatic conditions is inconsistent with reality to justify all the primitive traits that the African populations present.
All humans evolved “up, up, and away” from an ape ancestor, but Africans did not evolve as far away, for the simple reason that they remained in the same type of environment that that ape ancestor lived in (i.e., they were close to equilibrium, Chapter 4, Rule 10) and were not subjected to the harsh selection of a northern climate. Furthermore, only a small part of the evolution of Africans was due to the selection of traits coded for by mutations that arose in Africans; instead, Africans mostly received mutations that had occurred in Eurasians when those Eurasians migrated into Africa and interbred with them. 1 Had no Eurasian hominins ever entered Africa, there would be no members of the Homo genus in Africa today.
On this page I will try to present the topic from another angle, the cited book rejects the "Out of Africa" event and capitalize on the "Out of Asia" instead (it is easy to navigate through titles and chapters), what follows still go with the "Out of Africa" theory and present a glimpse of light on the partially evolved state of the African race. I don't need Scientific details because I'm not an Anthropologist, what interests me is proving that there is an "evolutionary deficit", meaning that Africans didn't evolve to be modern humans, or as I describe the African race: "advanced homo erectus/Archaic homo sapien", as mentioned above, timing is important and you can't stop time to make a sharp-clear distinction between the evolutionary phases, evolution is continuous, complex and long term changes.
Evolution is not an exact science, what follows is an approximative presentation of the overall phases that life on earth passed through from Dinosaurs to hominids, hominins, and ultimately modern humans. The latest section will present scientific proof of the substantial contribution of ghost archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations.
Reminder that archeology and Anthropology fields are based on hypotheses and assumptions that are using science to prove them accurate, and they are in constant controversy because there are perpetual new findings causing changes to presumed true theories.
Because of the importance of this Post "THE DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE", it will be divided into 2 Parts:
"GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE" and "PRACTICAL APPLICATION ON DEMOGRAPHICS".
An Annexe about: "Miscegenation as a modern days' projection of Archaic Introgression" will be posted right after this post, the base of this Annexe will be the page "Erectus Walks Amongst Us" which does not mean that there are actually prehistoric hominins wearing clothes walking around people, the overall idea is that there are prehistoric genes and Archaic introgression that has been transmitted to modern populations through extensive, prehistoric, multi-generational cross-breeding.
It will be followed by a presentations of: "The Plague of Archaic genes in modern populations: Diversity." whichwillhave as a subject to prove that miscegenation is modern days projection of Archaic introgression, to a limited 'evolved' extent, as a consequence, when we pass from this part: "GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE" to "PRACTICAL APPLICATION ON DEMOGRAPHICS", It will be evident that modern days' diversified populations have at its core an Archaic-ancestry/improved-by-modern-humans'-genes, which will lead to what's going on today in the planet's demographics: "THE GREAT DILUTION":the emergence of a new form of modern humans, a Frankenstein form of life at it's core the Archaic genes of extinct Hominins preserved, as mammoth's DNA is preserved in Siberia, and it is possible to Use recovered DNA to "genetically resurrect" the extinct specie, with Hominins, genes never have to be frozen because there were Archaic introgression and when you think that a "significant" percentage of inherited Archaic genes is not enough to cause a resurrection, think again, we share about 99% of our DNA with primates, small but tantalizing differences in the genomes make us look and act different.
This is why the "GREAT DILUTION" going-on in today's demographics is some kind of a "Resurrection of Extinct Hominins".
The Spiritual Context of the Archaic introgression will be treated at 2 levels:
In terms of individuals or small groups, when populations and kinds were isolated in their restricted geographic areas because of proximity or under-development of transit and communication systems, as the first level, and in terms of different kinds with different ancestry-related Archaic introgression bonding in groups, organizations, nations, blocs, allies, all the way up to entities controlling large demographic bases, as the second level, as we witnessed with the globalization of the planet and the emergence of the Zionist pole, which has at it Core "resurrecting extinct hominins" taking over the planet, replacing local populations through made-up crisis and proxy wars, causing refugees, asylum seekers, caravans, migrant crisis, and pushing modern humans to the side, it is well presented by the hegemony of the US, Israel, and following western nations on the international scene, notwithstanding the emergence of a holy opposing pole at it's core Russia which is at the far north proximity of the planet, away from this miscegenation as a modern days projection of Archaic introgression, at least until now, it seems Archaic genes invasion are at the Belarus border, the GREAT DILUTION is on-going and the Take Over is concretizing.
Always in this spiritual context of the Archaic introgression: Groups such Antifa BLM, and similar left tendencies for instance have at its core all kinds of Archaic introgression propelled genes in modern appearances, represent a spirit of Archaic hominins in modern appearance competing for resources and territories with the opposing Right groups, and mostly fighting the spirit that dominates them since Neanderthals, Right and far-Right groups, sometimes contain fake elements, because been infiltrated, often overpowered because of the on-going GREAT DILUTION and the happening of the Take Over.
GENEALOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE
There is evidence of hybridization between modern humans and other species of the genus Homo. In 2010, the Neanderthal genome project showed that 1–4% of DNA from all people living today, apart from most Sub-Saharan Africans, is of Neanderthal heritage.
The overall idea of this post is that there are 3 main hominins who are genetically related to the modern days' population:
Homo s. Sapiens, Neanderthals, and Home Erectus/archaic Homo Sapien. This is not the strict presentation from an Anthropological perspective, this post is not an archeology or Anthropology study, but it aims to make a practical application of science to make some sense of the diversity of today's population from an evolutionary point of view.
There are many evolutionary lineages and branches, most of them went extinct or produced a variety that does not concern our point of interest in the world's populations, Denisovans for instance, went extinct, left genetic traces in Australian Aborigines, and some Asian people, this hominin have no importance in this post, because it's genetic traces are present in populations that are isolated or do not affect modern day's world populations.
Homo s. Sapien DNA represents the predominant genes in modern humans, Neanderthal even though went extinct left considerable genetic traces in all of today's modern population except sub-Saharan Africans, the mention of Homo Erectus must be taken with caution because, while it sounds politically incorrect, it is more to point out to an advanced stage of the Homo Erectus and an Archaic phase of Homo Sapien, and more to the specific primitive nature of the African people, lacking any trace of Neanderthals and are not modern humans.
Based on the extremely simplified Anthropological presentation above, the world's population genealogy will be more or less a mix of the 3 cited hominins' genes. Homo s. Sapiens are today's modern humans, the more you have African genes the more you tend to be primitive, the more the inherited Neanderthals' genes percentage is significant the more you are considered Semitic races, and because modern humans mixed with Neanderthals, the lesser Neanderthals genes you inherit, the more you tend to be modern humans.
Anthropological roots of the recent demographic shift
Evolution is the ensemble of anatomical, mental, and behavioral changes that happened among the same group of hominins in a straight lineage and eventually will spread into branches, it is a complex process, it occurs on a long period of time, in a matter of millions of years in terms of lineages, branches take a relatively shorter period of time to form, anthropologically speaking.
While archaic introgression happened it is often on a larger span of time, of limited effects on altering the genetic traits of the receiving hominin because it often happens in narrowed very isolated cases due to the limited scale of interactions between the different hominins. It is totally insignificant compared to the recent genetics-related physiological changes we witness in populations or racial groups derived by cross-breeding with other kinds, this cross-breeding is an interference of "unnatural factors" that alter the natural path leading to "evolution". "Evolution" happens because of environmental constraints forcing a natural selection that causes survival of the fittest and adaptation of the survivors to hostile milieus, it goes in a straight intelligently designed path to 'create' the fully evolved beings called modern humans, the intervention of "unnatural factors" such as Horizontal or Vertical genes transfer from other racial groups, the incarnation of other hominins in an advanced stage such as Semitic races or Africans. "Vertical genes transfer" is simply interracial crossbreed, "Horizontal genes transfer" is used in a metaphorical sense, because while it is known to happen between simple organisms, proved to be happening within humans to a certain limited extinct, it is mentioned in a figurative sense to describe the craziness and mania that the abomination of interracial sex reached, mostly biologic fluids exchanges between different races that is not forcibly leading to the fertilization of the ovule and as a consequence the traditional vertical genes transfer.
Taking in consideration this crucial, major event that is the discovery of the Americas, the demographic composition of the planet before the discovery of the new world, the extensive cross-breeding that happened in the Americas and later on submerged the planet, we notice that before that Event the demographic composition of the planet was centered around Europeans as modern humans reached the optimal evolutionary stage at the root of the revolution industrial and all the progress humanity will ever reach, it's like Europe is the core of human civilization, while other kinds in other continents existed as 'archaic' forms of life (relatively speaking), either its Africans in Africa, native Americans in the Americas, aboriginal Australians, Indians in India, or Asians in Asia, we won't say that they aren't fully evolved humans because its politically incorrect, but it is evident that they were a lot more primitive and backwarded compared to Europeans, definitely in different degrees of development depending on the region and proximity to Europe. A special mention must be made of a certain group that existed in parallel to Europeans, of course, it's the "Semitic races" as presented in Part 1, their marginal and racial situation may be explained by the existence and multi-generational transmission of Neanderthals genes in parallel to modern humans, in Europe, geographical proximities, and other continents.
That was the demographic fabric of the planet before the last few decades, specifically before WWs. After WWII we will witness major populations movements, besides the major settlement of African slaves in America and the Spaniards mixing with native Americans' remains, a major migratory movement happened from Europe, mostly of Jewish origin and other "Semitic races" will be followed by the influx of immigrants from all backgrounds and continents including Asians and Indians to the US, in parallel, we witness the same thing in Europe at a slower pace but will reach it's peak in volume and speed during latest refugees crisis happening because of proxy wars instigated by the Zionist entity to grant the safety of its succursale (Israel) by diluting the whole planet, which is a modern days' biblical exodus, mirroring the Jews expulsion from nations throughout the history, now it's payback, we see the Semitic races forcing their way into Nations.
Zionism will make this demographic invasion the bedrock and the basis for its Take Over of western societies, the evil scheme that started a long time ago, will ultimately cause Zionist agents to occupy key positions in Europe and American political organs, allowing them to pass laws and policies which will cause foreigners to have more rights than the locals.
The Discovery of the Americas was a decisive Event:
Upon the discovery of the new world, the demographic composition of the planet was limited to racial groups that 'evolved' in their respective geographic areas.
Ignoring Asians and Australians, Africans evolved in Africa, Europeans in Europe, and native Americans in the Americas. Those groups were mostly isolated from each other, except for the occasional, rare encounters and cross-breeding or interactions (ignoring Arabic's slaves' trade, because it is unimportant to the global perspective compared to the transatlantic slaves' trade, despite the fact that mixing with slaves was one of the causes of the collapse of the Ottoman empire, the west is following on the same steps).
The Evil side (as presented in part 1, 'archaic' human beings are prone to Evil corruption because of their partially evolved state) unleashed into direct contact with modern humans, either its slaves in plantations or native Americans, it's the ultimate judgment and the greatest test humanity will ever know.
Will modern Humans prevail, submit and keep this lower form of life under control, lead it from darkness to the right divine path or will the lower form of life thrive, using humanity resources and all the progress we made, use it against us, take over and prevail leading us into Darkness?
Archaic Hominins didn't evolve to survive natural selection or the confrontation with other Hominins yet they didn't go fully extinct, they been absorbed through their genes by modern humans through cross-breeding (archaic introgression) or existed in isolated areas away from potential predators and as a consequence the potential of a modern humans' genes infusion which explains their primitive traits, that's why Homo S. sapiens inherited more or less Archaic genes, which explains the existence of Semitic races.%20-%20Copy.jpg)
Crossbreeding with modern humans is a matter of survival for people inheriting archaic genes, this explains the obsession with the globalization of the planet because diluting predominantly white nations will suppress the demographic weight of a kind that dominate them throughout history, immigration to more evolved countries will cause this genes flow and the overall improvement of primitive to not say Archaic traits, beyond institutionalized eugenics such as Racial whitening, Selective breeding, and such Eugenics programs forced by a government on the populations to achieve certain préétablis goals, either in populations control or improvement.
People with pronounced archaic traits will have their own Eugenic programs in the figurative sense of the term, they tend to intuitively adhere to approaches and traditions that will improve their primitive traits and dilute their Archaic features when procreating or planning to, that's why we find a tendency to be motivated or maybe dedicated to cause that genes flow, it is a matter of survival or extinction. Guadeloupe survived and saved her people, Neanderthals and probably other Archaic Hominins survived a theoretical extinction through their genes, African slaves improved their overall appearance and benefited from preferable treatment for having light features, Semitic races improved their overall appearances and melted better in a white society by cross-breeding with the locals and even going as far as the extreme practice of abducting Slavic girls.
Every race will try to improve its kind's genetics to the ideal of modern humans, which will cause a total confusion about today's demographics (it seems that the whole planet's populations are Homo S. Sapiens because diversity and dilution happened), while denying and even criticizing their distant roots, we see colored people with primitive traits (because of distant Archaic genes inheritance) Or Not (miscegenation) emerging in modern humans appearances, full of pretensions because they forged a new identity and they are the new modern humans now, while Homo S. Sapiens are outdated as a race, they are eclipsing them, and diversity is the new norm. We witness a certain arrogance of these new forms of life emerging out of miscegenation (modern days archaic introgression, considering the primitive state and Archaic traits of isolated populations), somehow they consider themselves better than modern humans or like a replacement, typical Beast reasoning and arrogance, it is never the primitive kinds simple mind, neither modern humans humility but a new spirit, arrogant pretentious and insolent, an Evil spirit in a new presentation, rise of the beast.
